Full Disclosure mailing list archives
Re: Fwd: wikileaks still under attack, pressure revved up
From: Christie Dudley <longobord () gmail com>
Date: Fri, 22 Oct 2010 22:36:05 -0700
The problem with picking the bits that they think the world needs to know is that is the point where editorialization happens. It would be against the spirit of providing a complete disclosure to trim back the data in any way. C _______ But wait... there's no FCC on the moon! On Fri, Oct 22, 2010 at 3:44 PM, Cal Leeming [Simplicity Media Ltd] < cal.leeming () simplicitymedialtd co uk> wrote:
You do raise a very good argument, especially the part about "security through obscurity". I don't know if Wikileaks have done a good thing or not, but rather than release everything, they should have had someone analyse the documents, and pick out the bits which they felt the public needed to know (anything considered a scandal etc) .. We don't care about soldiers movements or tactics, but an insurgent might... I see little reason why they'd need to release all the documents, other than out of lazyness/insufficient staff to review all the info.. On Fri, Oct 22, 2010 at 7:08 PM, <Valdis.Kletnieks () vt edu> wrote:On Thu, 21 Oct 2010 13:06:15 PDT, Jonathan Medina said:I am in the military, currently in Iraq, and these Wikileaks posts have hurt us more than people realize. It does two things, first, it demonstrates our tactics and procedures which allow insurgents to conduct more effective attacks against us,I suspect that the insurgents already knew 90 to 95% of our tactics and procedures simply by observing how we do things. After all, most of what we do can be easily learned by a good scout with a vantage point and a good pair of binoculars. How far apart do we drive on a convoy? Which armaments are on the vehicles in front, at back? Which directions do the lookouts on the first and last vehicles tend to look? What formations do we use during house-to-house searches? These are all things that any competent commander has to assume the other side knows because the other side has good scouts and access to binoculars. Think - how much do *we* know about insurgent tactics even without Wikileaks posting the insurgent playbook? As a result, even 100% perfect knowledge of our tactics wouldn't translate into all *that* big an increase in attack effectiveness, unless hidden in that 5% is a "ventilation shaft that leads directly to the reactor core" flaw in our tactics ("Every 3rd Tuesday, we do XYZ and one very small bomb in the right place would set off a chain reaction of all the munitions on the base"). And if we have that sort of flaw in our tactics, maybe we should actually fix them rather than depend on security through obscurity. Just sayin'.andsecond, the informationit provides to insurgents endangers our sources and the families of sources that have provided us with valuable information. It also provides a means of giving insurgents propaganda to use against us.I believe the "endangers our sources" part has already been debunked by the top leadership at the Pentagon. _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/-- Cal Leeming Operational Security & Support Team *Out of Hours: *+44 (07534) 971120 | *Support Tickets: * support () simplicitymedialtd co uk *Fax: *+44 (02476) 578987 | *Email: *cal.leeming () simplicitymedialtd co uk *IM: *AIM / ICQ / MSN / Skype (available upon request) Simplicity Media Ltd. All rights reserved. Registered company number 7143564 -- Cal Leeming Operational Security & Support Team *Out of Hours: *+44 (07534) 971120 | *Support Tickets: * support () simplicitymedialtd co uk *Fax: *+44 (02476) 578987 | *Email: *cal.leeming () simplicitymedialtd co uk *IM: *AIM / ICQ / MSN / Skype (available upon request) Simplicity Media Ltd. All rights reserved. Registered company number 7143564 _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
_______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
Current thread:
- Re: wikileaks still under attack, pressure revved up, (continued)
- Re: wikileaks still under attack, pressure revved up Cal Leeming [Simplicity Media Ltd] (Oct 21)
- Re: wikileaks still under attack, pressure revved up PsychoBilly (Oct 22)
- Re: wikileaks still under attack, pressure revved up Jonathan Medina (Oct 21)
- Re: wikileaks still under attack, pressure revved up Shain Singh (Oct 22)
- Re: wikileaks still under attack, pressure revved up Ana Kismet (Oct 22)
- Re: wikileaks still under attack, pressure revved up Valdis . Kletnieks (Oct 22)
- Re: wikileaks still under attack, pressure revved up Colin Copley (Oct 22)
- Message not available
- Fwd: wikileaks still under attack, pressure revved up Cal Leeming [Simplicity Media Ltd] (Oct 22)
- Re: Fwd: wikileaks still under attack, pressure revved up John Bond (Oct 23)
- Re: Fwd: wikileaks still under attack, pressure revved up Cal Leeming [Simplicity Media Ltd] (Oct 23)
- Re: Fwd: wikileaks still under attack, pressure revved up Christie Dudley (Oct 23)
- Re: wikileaks still under attack, pressure revved up PsychoBilly (Oct 26)
- Message not available
- Re: wikileaks still under attack, pressure revved up Charles Timko (Oct 26)
- Re: wikileaks still under attack, pressure revved up Harry Behrens (Oct 21)
- Re: wikileaks still under attack, pressure revved up Charles Timko (Oct 21)
- Re: wikileaks still under attack, pressure revved up BMF (Oct 21)
- Re: wikileaks still under attack, pressure revved up coderman (Oct 21)
- Re: wikileaks still under attack, pressure revved up Troy Canasta (Oct 24)