Re: Congratulations Andrew

[gillis jones <gillis57 () gmail com>]

Typically I just lurk and watch the much more opinionated of the list
discuss. However,


I'm gunna disagree here, If you put something up on a publically facing
webpage, and it's supposed to be confidential information. It sure as hell
better have a non-default password, let alone a password period! It would be
like the military putting up confidential battle plans online w/o a barrier
and expecting the enemy not to use them. It's simply idiotic, and ridiculous
to try and prosecute someone for your idiocy.

Now that I've said my two cents, Im going to sink back into the depths.

On Wed, Jun 16, 2010 at 11:34 AM, Thor (Hammer of God) <Thor () hammerofgod com
> wrote:

>  By the same logic, then yes you would.  Which is why the statement “if a
> system has no password, then you have a legal right to whatever data is on
> it” is complete horse hockey.
>
>
>
> Don’t take technical advice from your lawyer, and don’t take legal advice
> from people on security lists.
>
>
>
> t
>
>
>
> *From:* full-disclosure-bounces () lists grok org uk [mailto:
> full-disclosure-bounces () lists grok org uk] *On Behalf Of *wilder_jeff
> Wilder
> *Sent:* Wednesday, June 16, 2010 11:56 AM
> *To:* full-disclosure () lists grok org uk
>
> *Subject:* Re: [Full-disclosure] Congratulations Andrew
>
>
>
>
> By that same standard.. if you leave your house unlocked.... does that give
> someone the right to enter it?
>
> just my thoughts
>  ------------------------------
>
> Date: Wed, 16 Jun 2010 19:58:27 +0200
> From: uuf6429 () gmail com
> To: tbiehn () gmail com
> CC: full-disclosure () lists grok org uk; Valdis.Kletnieks () vt edu
> Subject: Re: [Full-disclosure] Congratulations Andrew
>
> Reminds be of Al Capone and tax evasion ;-)
>
> Good ol' America.
>
>
>
>  On Wed, Jun 16, 2010 at 7:49 PM, T Biehn <tbiehn () gmail com> wrote:
>
> Yes.
> The FBI was investigating the AT&T incident, presumably the AT&T incident
> was what the fed were serving against.
> What possible valid search warrant could be executed? There was no hack,
> breach, illegal access of data, or anything else for that matter.
>
> If you leave a system online with no password which allows you to scrape
> content you have a legal right to scrape that content.
>
> -Travis
>
>
>
> On Wed, Jun 16, 2010 at 11:10 AM, <Valdis.Kletnieks () vt edu> wrote:
>
> On Wed, 16 Jun 2010 10:09:22 EDT, T Biehn said:
>
> > I doubt the search warrant will hold up in court.
>
> Do you have any actual basis for saying that?  Sure, the warrant might be
> bullshit, it might be solid - the article doesn't give us enough info
> either
> way to tell.
>
> "Auernheimer was also arrested in March for giving a false name to law
> enforcement officers responding to a parking complaint."
>
> Sad.  The dude may have the intelligence to pull the hack, but not have the
> wisdom to not dig a hole deeper. Just man up and take the frikking parking
> ticket. ;)
>
>
>
>  --
> FD1D E574 6CAB 2FAF 2921  F22E B8B7 9D0D 99FF A73C
> http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?search=tbiehn&op=index&fingerprint=on
> http://pastebin.com/f6fd606da
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
> Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
> Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
>
>
>  ------------------------------
>
> The New Busy is not the old busy. Search, chat and e-mail from your inbox. Get
> started.<http://www.windowslive.com/campaign/thenewbusy?ocid=PID28326::T:WLMTAGL:ON:WL:en-US:WM_HMP:042010_3>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
> Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
> Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/