Full Disclosure mailing list archives
Re: Patent Absurdity - How software patents broke the system
From: "M.B.Jr." <marcio.barbado () gmail com>
Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2010 14:45:01 -0300
Hi Rohit, sorry for such a delay in this reply. On Sat, Jul 24, 2010 at 8:49 PM, Rohit Patnaik <quanticle () gmail com> wrote:
Now here's a question that should bring this thread back on-topic. How patentable are security tools?
Your point alludes to one very generical concept but it is interesting for it gives the chance to extirpate some confusion people make in this subject. See, maybe you don't clearly understand the difference between a license and a patent. A license is a contract between a licensor and a licensee. These 2 parties could be 2 commercial companies for example. So, if your company's employees write some code, licensed under proprietary premises, then your company won't have to make the sources available to its customers, because they accepted the license. The relationship is between your company and the one buying software from it. Now, a software patent, say, in the US, is a government rule which gives a patentee, exclusive rights in a process, which often involves math. Suppose your software's algorithms make use of a patent you have never heard of. I mean, you know the process, obviously. Though, you didn't know it was patented. The patentee can sue you because of that. When the relationship becomes clear, you see it is between your company and some party you didn't know until that moment. And then, if your company wants to keep selling the software its own employees wrote, it will have to pay cash for the referred party (the once unknown patentee). The point is, trivial algos often represent patents. You know stupid people? Well, sometimes they think, and when they think, they get amused and sassy with that, like: "OMG! am I an inventive smart badass or what?!" they presuppose originality based on the environment they live in. And sometimes, they manage to turn that trivial math stupidity into a government rule. But math constitutes a public domain group of sciences. Security is exactly there, where your software, based upon public domain mathematics, is threatened by discontinuation or modification, which risks your company's stability and your customers' businesses. If one wants to protect his "inventive" equations, he can do it through a proprietary license contract between his represented party and his customers. Though, the State must be aware of some other thinking-capable people's presence in the world, which means, different people may get to similar equations/algos. Capiche? Don't worry about your fuzzers. License your tools the way you think it's reasonable to you. Regards,
On Thu, Jul 15, 2010 at 11:31 PM, M.B.Jr. <marcio.barbado () gmail com> wrote:Hello. Patent Absurdity explores the case of software patents and the history of judicial activism that led to their rise, and the harm being done to software developers and the wider economy. The film is based on a series of interviews conducted during the Supreme Court's review of in re Bilski — a case that could have profound implications for the patenting of software. http://patentabsurdity.com/watch.html Regards, Marcio Barbado, Jr. _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
Marcio Barbado, Jr. _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
Current thread:
- Patent Absurdity - How software patents broke the system M.B.Jr. (Jul 15)
- Re: Patent Absurdity - How software patents broke the system Rohit Patnaik (Jul 24)
- Re: Patent Absurdity - How software patents broke the system M.B.Jr. (Jul 28)
- Message not available
- Re: Patent Absurdity - How software patents broke the system M.B.Jr. (Jul 28)
- Re: Patent Absurdity - How software patents broke the system M.B.Jr. (Jul 28)
- Re: Patent Absurdity - How software patents broke the system Rohit Patnaik (Jul 24)