Full Disclosure mailing list archives

Re: Patent Absurdity - How software patents broke the system


From: Rohit Patnaik <quanticle () gmail com>
Date: Sat, 24 Jul 2010 18:49:28 -0500

Now here's a question that should bring this thread back on-topic.  How
patentable are security tools?  Lets say, for example, that I got a patent
on fuzzers - i.e. a patent on the process of generating random input for a
program.  Could it be that I could restrict the availability and use of
these tools?  That'd be pretty worrying from a security perspective, no?

-- Rohit Patnaik

On Thu, Jul 15, 2010 at 11:31 PM, M.B.Jr. <marcio.barbado () gmail com> wrote:

Hello.

Patent Absurdity explores the case of software patents and the history
of judicial activism that led to their rise, and the harm being done
to software developers and the wider economy. The film is based on a
series of interviews conducted during the Supreme Court's review of in
re Bilski — a case that could have profound implications for the
patenting of software.

http://patentabsurdity.com/watch.html


Regards,



Marcio Barbado, Jr.

_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/

_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/

Current thread: