Re: Brilliant attack "bypasses" bitlocker

["Thor (Hammer of God)" <thor () hammerofgod com>]

/me sheepishly acquiesces to Dan publically.

Dan is right, I am wrong.  After consulting our resident grammar expert, I have been corrected.  My apologies to Dan 
for incorrectly attributing a grammatical error to his piece.  I was going to bet on it too ;)

t

-----Original Message-----
From: Dan Goodin [mailto:dgoodin () sitpub com] 
Sent: Friday, December 11, 2009 2:21 PM
To: Thor (Hammer of God)
Subject: Re: Brilliant attack "bypasses" bitlocker

"Methods" is an object in the sentence. I think what's confusing you is
that it comes ahead of the subject, which is "attack."

Thor (Hammer of God) wrote:
> Sorry, you're wrong on this one.  Only if your structure was "The hardware-level phishing attack" as the object and 
> not "methods" would you be correct.  But it's not....  The methods "are," not the methods "is."  You might have 
> intended that to be the case, but you didn't write it like that.
>
> t

_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/