Full Disclosure mailing list archives
Re: What RedHat doesn't want you to know about ExecShield (without NX)
From: spender () grsecurity net (Brad Spengler)
Date: Mon, 14 May 2007 17:37:39 -0400
Now if you want to discuss the execshield implementation that's currently shipping in FC6 or the about-to-escape FC7, we'll be more than happy to listen.
Hello hotshot, In fact I was discussing the execshield implementation that's currently shipping in FC6 and the about-to-escape FC7, and you weren't more than happy to listen. The comment about FC3 was in addition to the still-present issues I discussed and was mentioned in the same area since I noted the PIE binary non-determinism at the same time. Maybe you should read first, and open your mouth afterwards. -Brad
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
Current thread:
- What RedHat doesn't want you to know about ExecShield (without NX) Brad Spengler (May 14)
- Re: What RedHat doesn't want you to know about ExecShield (without NX) Valdis . Kletnieks (May 14)
- Re: [Dailydave] What RedHat doesn't want you to know about ExecShield (without NX) Steve Grubb (May 14)
- Re: [Dailydave] What RedHat doesn't want you to know about ExecShield (without NX) Brad Spengler (May 14)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: What RedHat doesn't want you to know about ExecShield (without NX) Brad Spengler (May 14)