Full Disclosure mailing list archives
Re: infosecbofh
From: Joe Average <yahooinsider () gmail com>
Date: Fri, 6 Jan 2006 00:18:44 +0000
Thanks for your worthless rant, Please confirn to us you're not a bot http://www.google.com/sorry/?continue=http://groups.google.com/group/n3td3v Take care now. On 1/5/06, GroundZero Security <fd () g-0 org> wrote:
lol wow mr joe avarage aka n3td3v turns things around once again. if you check the thread, you brought yourself up as usually. are you so busy to talk shit that you cant keep track of what you say ? yes figures, since all you try is get more hits on your kiddie blog shit. erm and you still wonder why people bash you ? now come on, you announced to go "underground" so do that. the only problem is that nowdays the underground is pretty closed down/private and you have to actually proove that you know your shit and can code to get trusted. after all the lameness you started on fulldisclosure, it will be hard to find anyone that doesnt laugh about you. but hey you should try to hang with some defacer kids as they think they are the real underground too and then you can go xss the planet together. maybe someday you find a php file inclusion vulnerability and feel damn special as the defacer kidz will think your a real hacker with 0d4y c0d3 !!! you should keep learning about security instead of beeing such a smart mouth. then in a few years you will see what a lamer you have been and might be able to laugh about your own stupidity. then again i doubt you will ever learn anything. people tried to tell you nicely, but all you can do is brag about things even though everyone already knows that you are nothing but a steam blower. oh and by the way, your little pathetic try to send me mass mails failed :P setting up a gmail account with forwarding to my mail account and then register it to all securityfocus mailinglists just shows how lame you really are. 1 line added and of course it got blocked of my mailserver and stopped it all. wasnt annoying, just funny to see that you are stuck in the early 90s where that may have still worked. you are outdated :-D oh and another little note - there is no such thing as a "yahoo scene" that might be you and your imaginary friend joe avarage. and dont reply now once again with your standard phrases that we just would be jealous of your xss. it may be a risk, but its nothing special at all. everyone but you realizes it. xss is the most easy bug to find. i could teach an ape how to find xss in 5 minutes, but its a waste of time and even the ape would get bored. <script>alert("STFU");</script> -sk ----- Original Message ----- *From:* Joe Average <yahooinsider () gmail com> *To:* Stan Bubrouski <stan.bubrouski () gmail com> ; full-disclosure () lists grok org uk *Sent:* Thursday, January 05, 2006 9:23 PM *Subject:* Re: [Full-disclosure] infosecbofh Why are you mentioning n3td3v? This thread is about infosecbofh, please keep on topic. I don't believe the two XSSing vulnerabilities on Google Groups is all netdev is responsible for. Look closer into whats going on. Theres a world of conspriacy out there to be had. Lets not argue amoung ourselfs. The Sober.z variant will be attacking tomorrow and speculation that it'll have a WMF exploit payload is already sweeping the underground. I think we should be concentrating on that kind of thing, than arguing on really low priorty topics like who is more of a disruption than who on a mailing list. Take care now. On 1/5/06, Stan Bubrouski <stan.bubrouski () gmail com> wrote:Oh where to begin... On 1/5/06, Joe Average <yahooinsider () gmail com > wrote:I guess he got bored of turning netdev into public enemy number one,to You are n3td3v, and talking in the third person under an assumed identity just adds to your own turmoil.divert attention away from the real guy who is messing up the list,none Yep infosecbofh, joe average, n3td3v, etc... are a nuisance, but in infosecbofh's defense he seems to be using only one email account to torture his victims.other than the guy who has never released any securityvulnerabilities... Ipresent to you...mr infosecbofh...round of applause!You keep coming back to this but all you ever find is XSS in sites, not even in products or such. I'm not putting down what you do, but you act like its so important and that it makes you more important even though it doesn't. Also, its hard to be sympathetic for you getting picked on when you *clearly* try to instigate situations at every turn, and when n3td3v isn't mentioned in a thread you bring him up, and he's you so what can you expect? Please stop responding to this crap, its no secret you want it to continue so your name gets more hits on google, but the rest of us could care less about you or problems with everyone who ever contradicts you. Stay in school and shut up. PLEASE. Best Regards, sb------------------------------ _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
_______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
Current thread:
- Re: infosecbofh, (continued)
- Re: infosecbofh Joe Average (Jan 05)
- Re: infosecbofh Andre Ludwig (Jan 05)
- Re: infosecbofh womber (Jan 05)
- Re: infosecbofh GroundZero Security (Jan 05)
- Re: infosecbofh Joe Average (Jan 05)
- Re: infosecbofh c0ntex (Jan 05)
- Re: infosecbofh foofus (Jan 05)
- Re: infosecbofh Stan Bubrouski (Jan 05)
- Re: infosecbofh Joe Average (Jan 05)
- Re: infosecbofh Stan Bubrouski (Jan 05)
- Message not available
- Re: infosecbofh Joe Average (Jan 05)
- Re: infosecbofh John Cartwright (Jan 05)
- Re: infosecbofh Joe Average (Jan 05)
- Re: infosecbofh Exibar (Jan 06)
- RE: infosecbofh Paul (Jan 07)
- Re: infosecbofh InfoSecBOFH (Jan 07)
- Re: infosecbofh fok yo (Jan 07)
- Re: infosecbofh michael tewner (Jan 05)