Full Disclosure mailing list archives
Re: PWCK Overflow POC Code Redhat/Suse older versions or something (maybe later too)
From: Valdis.Kletnieks () vt edu
Date: Mon, 09 May 2005 16:09:01 -0400
On Mon, 09 May 2005 11:59:16 PDT, Day Jay said:
It was figured out long ago pal, the fact of the matter is and that I pointed out numbskull is that he should automate getting of the stack pointer like all of the other one's do.
Except the code you were penis-extender-waving around as an example of how you have to steal lame exploits you can't even fix. Figure out how to get that 1700 automated in *your* code, and then we'll talk. (I'd not get on your case about it, except that the code you posted has *more* hardcoding in it than the code you're complaining about).
It's a default value hardcoded in..let it go.
So now you're admitting it's a default value, not a hardcoded one? Whatever happened to standing up for your position? (And you're still missing the point - if it's a changeable value with a default, it's not hardcoded).
You and your gay lover can continue looking at kiddie porn now.
When all else fails, resort to ad hominem attacks. You know, with a bad attitude like that, it's not surprising that you can't get access to any better exploits to steal.
Attachment:
_bin
Description:
_______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
Current thread:
- Re: PWCK Overflow POC Code Redhat/Suse older versions or something (maybe later too), (continued)
- Re: PWCK Overflow POC Code Redhat/Suse older versions or something (maybe later too) Micheal Espinola Jr (May 09)
- Re: PWCK Overflow POC Code Redhat/Suse older versions or something (maybe later too) Brian Debottari (May 09)
- Re: PWCK Overflow POC Code Redhat/Suse older versions or something (maybe later too) Day Jay (May 09)
- Re: PWCK Overflow POC Code Redhat/Suse older versions or something (maybe later too) imipak (May 09)
- Re: PWCK Overflow POC Code Redhat/Suse older versions or something (maybe later too) Day Jay (May 09)
- Re: PWCK Overflow POC Code Redhat/Suse older versions or something (maybe later too) Day Jay (May 09)
- Re: PWCK Overflow POC Code Redhat/Suse older versions or something (maybe later too) Valdis . Kletnieks (May 09)
- Re: PWCK Overflow POC Code Redhat/Suse older versions or something (maybe later too) Day Jay (May 09)
- Re: PWCK Overflow POC Code Redhat/Suse older versions or something (maybe later too) Valdis . Kletnieks (May 09)
- Re: PWCK Overflow POC Code Redhat/Suse older versions or something (maybe later too) Day Jay (May 09)
- Re: PWCK Overflow POC Code Redhat/Suse older versions or something (maybe later too) Valdis . Kletnieks (May 09)
- Re: PWCK Overflow POC Code Redhat/Suse older versions or something (maybe later too) Day Jay (May 09)
- Re: PWCK Overflow POC Code Redhat/Suse older versions or something (maybe later too) Valdis . Kletnieks (May 09)
- Re: PWCK Overflow POC Code Redhat/Suse older versions or something (maybe later too) Valdis . Kletnieks (May 09)
- Re: PWCK Overflow POC Code Redhat/Suse older versions or something (maybe later too) J u a n (May 09)
- Re: PWCK Overflow POC Code Redhat/Suse older versions or something (maybe later too) Micheal Espinola Jr (May 09)
- Re: PWCK Overflow POC Code Redhat/Suse older versions or something (maybe later too) James Tucker (May 09)