Full Disclosure mailing list archives
Re: PWCK Overflow POC Code Redhat/Suse older versions or something (maybe later too)
From: Day Jay <d4yj4y () yahoo com>
Date: Mon, 9 May 2005 09:42:07 -0700 (PDT)
Stevie Wonder, Don't take your sexual frustrations out on me old man! Nice website! Sorry to inform you but all of your accomplishments throughout your mediocre professional life amount to nothing more than a few minutes of actual skill.. Your "MVP" award is the biggest piece of crap I've yet to hear about and the fact that you think you got root on vi and all of that when you were younger just makes me laugh. What you think you have accomplished even makes me giggle. Kinda also like all of the security work you have done in the past years. Your releases have been nothing short of crap!! One would think that someone with as much "knowledge and skill" and know-how you claim to have, you would have something impressive under your belt but the only thing I really see is a lame whitehat who thinks that making a living ripping off home users in his neighborhood is high class. You're just a mediocre fat fuck who failed miserably in life and everyone on here has years on you old man. But hey, we're still learning. Keep up the good work on your website!! You really have accomplished a lot in your life! --- Steve Friedl <steve () unixwiz net> wrote:
On Fri, May 06, 2005 at 06:03:26PM -0700, Day Jay wrote://(PWCK is NOT SETUID) This isn't fake //code I promise (it may be borrowed) ;) d4yj4yIt may or may not be fake, but you are an *astonishingly* lame C programmer:for(i=0; i < strlen(shellcode); i++) { *(ptr++) = shellcode[i]; }Wow.
Yahoo! Mail Stay connected, organized, and protected. Take the tour: http://tour.mail.yahoo.com/mailtour.html _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
Current thread:
- Re: PWCK Overflow POC Code Redhat/Suse older versions or something (maybe later too) Day Jay (May 09)
- Re: PWCK Overflow POC Code Redhat/Suse older versions or something (maybe later too) Steve Friedl (May 09)
- Re: PWCK Overflow POC Code Redhat/Suse older versions or something (maybe later too) Micheal Espinola Jr (May 09)
- Re: PWCK Overflow POC Code Redhat/Suse older versions or something (maybe later too) Brian Debottari (May 09)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: PWCK Overflow POC Code Redhat/Suse older versions or something (maybe later too) Day Jay (May 09)
- Re: PWCK Overflow POC Code Redhat/Suse older versions or something (maybe later too) imipak (May 09)
- Re: PWCK Overflow POC Code Redhat/Suse older versions or something (maybe later too) Day Jay (May 09)
- Re: PWCK Overflow POC Code Redhat/Suse older versions or something (maybe later too) Day Jay (May 09)
- Re: PWCK Overflow POC Code Redhat/Suse older versions or something (maybe later too) Valdis . Kletnieks (May 09)
- Re: PWCK Overflow POC Code Redhat/Suse older versions or something (maybe later too) Day Jay (May 09)
- Re: PWCK Overflow POC Code Redhat/Suse older versions or something (maybe later too) Valdis . Kletnieks (May 09)
- Re: PWCK Overflow POC Code Redhat/Suse older versions or something (maybe later too) Day Jay (May 09)
- Re: PWCK Overflow POC Code Redhat/Suse older versions or something (maybe later too) Valdis . Kletnieks (May 09)
- Re: PWCK Overflow POC Code Redhat/Suse older versions or something (maybe later too) Day Jay (May 09)
- Re: PWCK Overflow POC Code Redhat/Suse older versions or something (maybe later too) Valdis . Kletnieks (May 09)
- Re: PWCK Overflow POC Code Redhat/Suse older versions or something (maybe later too) Valdis . Kletnieks (May 09)
- Re: PWCK Overflow POC Code Redhat/Suse older versions or something (maybe later too) Steve Friedl (May 09)