Full Disclosure mailing list archives
Re: Reverse engineering the Windows TCP stack
From: Vladamir <wireless.insecurity () gmail com>
Date: Thu, 24 Mar 2005 22:02:48 -0500
I want to know because I just think it's weird. BSD has repeatedly responded consistently, so why hasn't Windows (especially after5 revisions)??
Aditya Deshmukh wrote:
AD> The win32 tcp stack was stolen from bsd^^^^^^^^^^ Get your facts right.Yes bsd lic was used so they dint actually steal it - but as it was 12 amwhen I send the mail so please excuse me for the mistake.. :)But I say in the lower lines in my that it was not copied properly. Now Iwill crawl back into my hole________________________________________________________________________ Delivered using the Free Personal Edition of Mailtraq (www.mailtraq.com) _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
_______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
Current thread:
- Re: Reverse engineering the Windows TCP stack, (continued)
- Re: Reverse engineering the Windows TCP stack James Longstreet (Mar 24)
- Re: Reverse engineering the Windows TCP stack Vladamir (Mar 25)
- Re: Reverse engineering the Windows TCP stack Thierry Zoller (Mar 25)
- Re: Reverse engineering the Windows TCP stack Vladamir (Mar 25)
- Re: Reverse engineering the Windows TCP stack ADT (Mar 25)
- Re: Reverse engineering the Windows TCP stack Thierry Zoller (Mar 26)
- Re: Reverse engineering the Windows TCP stack Vladamir (Mar 26)
- Re: Reverse engineering the Windows TCP stack Georgi Guninski (Mar 28)
- Re: Reverse engineering the Windows TCP stack NSC (Mar 29)
- Re: Reverse engineering the Windows TCP stack Vladamir (Mar 24)
- Re: Reverse engineering the Windows TCP stack Thierry Zoller (Mar 31)