Full Disclosure mailing list archives

Re: <Cisco Message> Mike Lynn's controversial Cisco Security Presentation


From: "J.A. Terranson" <measl () mfn org>
Date: Fri, 29 Jul 2005 20:51:01 -0500 (CDT)


On Fri, 29 Jul 2005, Jason Coombs wrote:

<cutting to the chase>

Now, if RC4 had never been used to create a product and had been kept as
a trade secret, and that secret had been published, then it would not
have become, automatically, an unencumbered algorithm that could be used
by anyone with impunity. There being no way other than theft of trade
secret for a third party to come to know the algorithm, had a court
order been obtained to halt the spread of the secret the algorithm
itself could very well have been kept as protectable intellectual
property until such time as the company that enjoyed a commercial
advantage through preservation of their RC4 trade secret had concluded
the public distribution of a product that somebody else could have
reverse engineered.

The problem here is essentially one of mass distribution.  There are now
*millions* of copies of these "secrets" in general circulation.  Nobody
can assert with a straight face that anything about Lynn's presentation is
not completely and totally within the public view - and irretrievably so.

-- 
Yours,

J.A. Terranson
sysadmin () mfn org
0xBD4A95BF


"A stock broker is someone who handles your money until its all gone."
Diana Hubbard (of Scientology fame)
_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/


Current thread: