Full Disclosure mailing list archives
RE: Re: Bash vulnerability?
From: "Aaron Bedra" <abedra () westervillelibrary org>
Date: Sun, 28 Aug 2005 02:56:13 -0400
Well stated, but that is not my point. I can't speak for everyone, but I do think that this list is about sharing useful information with anyone who desires to read it. The internet is full of places where these "dim bulbs" you speak of will get burned by things like this. This board is not the place for that. I do not say this from a moderator stand point, as I have nothing to do with moderating the list, but only as an individual who hopes that childish things like this would end up somewhere else. There are so many things that we can focus on that make a difference in the security world. It is easy to destroy with knowlege that is presented here, but seldom do you find a place that useful knowledge is presented and I for one think that it should not have to be soiled by trivial things such as this post. My intent was not to offend anyone, but rather to try and focus more on the real issues we are facing. People that you think are "the dim bulbs" will sort themselves out. And to really answer your question, RootmasterG is not doing anyone any favors in my opinion, just cluttering my already full inbox. Sorry to the list for the rant, but I just thought it needed to be said. Respectfully, Aaron J. Bedra
_______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
Current thread:
- Re: bash vulnerability?, (continued)
- Re: bash vulnerability? Rik Bobbaers (Aug 16)
- Re: bash vulnerability? Graham Reed (Aug 16)
- Re: bash vulnerability? nocfed (Aug 18)
- Re: bash vulnerability? nocfed (Aug 18)
- Re: Re: Bash vulnerability? Gilles DEMARTY (Aug 26)
- Re: Re: Bash vulnerability? Octal (Aug 26)
- Re: Re: Bash vulnerability? Aaron J. Bedra (Aug 26)
- Re: Re: Bash vulnerability? Valdis . Kletnieks (Aug 26)