Full Disclosure mailing list archives
Re: Re: AV companies better hire good lawyers soon.
From: James Tucker <jftucker () gmail com>
Date: Tue, 14 Sep 2004 22:24:05 +0100
According to the FBI fornsics agent I heard at a recent security conference this is a fairly common defense. The other is trying to claim that any gaps in the evidence chain are when a law enforcement type planted the porn there.
there are laws and processes which must be performed in order to make the evidence submitable in court. such accusations have no meaning under modern law, if the law tampers, the law cant use. _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
Current thread:
- Re: AV companies better hire good lawyers soon., (continued)
- Re: AV companies better hire good lawyers soon. Frank Knobbe (Sep 14)
- Re: AV companies better hire good lawyers soon. Nick FitzGerald (Sep 14)
- Re[2]: AV companies better hire good lawyers soon. 3APA3A (Sep 13)
- RE: AV companies better hire good lawyers soon. Jean Gruneberg (Sep 13)
- Re: AV companies better hire good lawyers soon. Florian Weimer (Sep 14)
- Re: AV companies better hire good lawyers soon. Frank Knobbe (Sep 14)
- Re: AV companies better hire good lawyers soon. Michael Simpson (Sep 15)
- Re: AV companies better hire good lawyers soon. Frank Knobbe (Sep 14)
- RE: AV companies better hire good lawyers soon. ajalal (Sep 14)
- Re: AV companies better hire good lawyers soon. Florian Weimer (Sep 14)
- Re: AV companies better hire good lawyers soon. gadgeteer (Sep 14)
- Re: Re: AV companies better hire good lawyers soon. James Tucker (Sep 14)
- Re: Re: AV companies better hire good lawyers soon. Florian Weimer (Sep 14)
- Re: AV companies better hire good lawyers soon. Florian Weimer (Sep 14)
- Re: AV companies better hire good lawyers soon. Alan J. Wylie (Sep 14)