Full Disclosure mailing list archives
Re: Why is IRC still around?
From: Danny <nocmonkey () gmail com>
Date: Fri, 19 Nov 2004 16:37:00 -0500
On Fri, 19 Nov 2004 15:54:54 -0500, Tim <tim-security () sentinelchicken org> wrote:
1) A hell of a lot of viruses/worms/trojans use IRC to wreck further havoc?Isn't email the primary spreading mechanism of viruses?
My mistake; I was referring to the discussion, collaboration, and creation, not the spread.
should we sunset email?
Some say we should, but I am not one of those. My point was to get rid of the most well established tool (and easiest to use) for these types of activities.
2) A considerable amount of "script kiddies" originate and grow through IRC?And if there were no IRC, they would use AIM, or MSN messenger, or more likely, jabber. What's the difference? It is popular amongst hackers (of any level of morality) because it is open.
What's the difference? IRC is so well established for the type of activity I am referring to.
3) A wee bit of software piracy occurs?And it doesn't on any other protocol? People who want to pirate will do it using whatever tools are available. Take away one, and others will be used.
I'll leave the piracy battle for someone else - I just mentioned it as a part of the problem.
4) That many organized DoS attacks through PC zombies are initiated through IRC?It wouldn't be any harder to pull this off via netcat. If it is the anonymity an attacker wants, they just use one of the zombies as the server.
Sure netcat is an alternative, but which one is easier to use?
5) The anonymity of the whole thing helps to foster all the illegal and malicious activity that occurs?How is it any more anonymous than email, or web, or any other unauthenticated protocol?
My point was to get rid of the most well established tool (and easiest to use) for these types of activities. You obviously can't get rid of them all.
Please don't tell me you trust the From: header in your email, or believe that all of the IPs in your weblogs are directly tied to a person's home PC.
And all these years.... frig!
The list goes on and on...Yes, but every one of those arguments is horribly flawed. I am not sure if you are just being a troll or what.
I thought I would throw out the idea. If you want to call me a troll, then so be it, but don't get your panties in a knot over the whole thing
Sorry to offend those that use IRC legitimately (LOL - find something else to chat with your buddies), but why the hell are we not pushing to sunset IRC? Am I narrow minded to say that it would be a much safer place?yes, you are being narrow-minded.
Fair enough. ...D _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
Current thread:
- Re: Why is IRC still around?, (continued)
- Re: Why is IRC still around? vord (Nov 23)
- Re: Why is IRC still around? n3td3v (Nov 24)
- Re: Why is IRC still around? vord (Nov 24)
- Re: Why is IRC still around? n3td3v (Nov 25)
- Re: Why is IRC still around? vord (Nov 26)
- Re: Why is IRC still around? n3td3v (Nov 26)
- Re: Why is IRC still around? n3td3v (Nov 22)
- RE: Why is IRC still around? xtrecate (Nov 22)
- Re: Why is IRC still around? bkfsec (Nov 22)
- Re: Why is IRC still around? Danny (Nov 19)
- Re: Why is IRC still around? Tim (Nov 19)
- Re: Why is IRC still around? Danny (Nov 20)
- Re: Why is IRC still around? chris neitzert (Nov 20)