Full Disclosure mailing list archives
Re: Re: New LSASS-based worm finally here (Sasser)
From: Jason <security () brvenik com>
Date: Mon, 03 May 2004 22:42:38 -0400
Javier Fernandez-Sanguino wrote: [...]
[1] Approaching the record of worms in other OS, which, I believe, is held by Scalper (10 days from patch to worm). But hey, they could browse the source changes for that one.
It did not attack an OS directly but I believe the witty worm [1] holds the record to date. A 1 day window from advisory to release, it attacked and destroyed a security component that was supposed to protect against these issues...
[1] - http://www.caida.org/analysis/security/witty/ _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
Current thread:
- Re: Sasser skips 10.x.x.x Why?, (continued)
- Re: Sasser skips 10.x.x.x Why? Thomas Springer (May 03)
- Unpacking Sasser youssef ALAOUI (May 03)
- RE: Sasser skips 10.x.x.x Why? Warnich Rust (May 03)
- Re: Sasser skips 10.x.x.x Why? Matt Wagenknecht (May 03)
- Re: Sasser skips 10.x.x.x Why? Shawn Cox (May 03)
- Re: Sasser skips 10.x.x.x Why? Eric Chien (May 03)
- Re: Sasser skips 10.x.x.x Why? Frank Knobbe (May 03)
- Re: Sasser skips 10.x.x.x Why? Eric Chien (May 03)
- Re: Sasser skips 10.x.x.x Why? Rodrigo Barbosa (May 03)
- Re: Sasser skips 10.x.x.x Why? Joe Stewart (May 03)
- Re: Re: New LSASS-based worm finally here (Sasser) Javier Fernandez-Sanguino (May 04)
- Re: Re: New LSASS-based worm finally here (Sasser) insecure (May 04)
- Re: New LSASS-based worm finally here (Sasser) Gadi Evron (May 04)
- Re: New LSASS-based worm finally here (Sasser) Javier Fernandez-Sanguino (May 05)