Full Disclosure mailing list archives
Re: Re: Cisco's stolen code
From: Valdis.Kletnieks () vt edu
Date: Wed, 26 May 2004 12:28:52 -0400
On Wed, 26 May 2004 09:48:22 EDT, Eric Scher <ericscher () mac com> said:
However, in order for THEFT of code to become a violation of copyright law, the statute ON copyright law would have to be ammended to make that a crime.
Nope. It's a legal slam dunk. How did you steal the code without making a copy of it? ;)
Attachment:
_bin
Description:
Current thread:
- Re: Re: Cisco's stolen code, (continued)
- Re: Re: Cisco's stolen code Marek Isalski (May 26)
- Re: Cisco's stolen code Cold Fire (May 26)
- RE: Cisco's stolen code Pikett/LKSI (May 26)
- RE: Cisco's stolen code Tobias Weisserth (May 26)
- RE: Re: Cisco's stolen code Glenn_Everhart (May 26)
- Re: Re: Cisco's stolen code Valdis . Kletnieks (May 26)
- Re: Re: Cisco's stolen code Maarten (May 26)
- Question About International Disclosure Tom (May 26)
- Re: Question About International Disclosure Ron DuFresne (May 26)
- Re: Re: Cisco's stolen code Marek Isalski (May 26)
- Re: Cisco's stolen code Eric Scher (May 26)
- Re: Re: Cisco's stolen code Valdis . Kletnieks (May 26)
- RE: Cisco's stolen code Brad Griffin (May 26)
- Re: Cisco's stolen code Seth Alan Woolley (May 27)
- Re: Re: Cisco's stolen code tcleary2 (May 26)
- Re: Re: Cisco's stolen code tcleary2 (May 26)
- Re: Re: Cisco's stolen code tcleary2 (May 26)
- RE: Cisco's stolen code Brad Griffin (May 27)
- Re: Cisco's stolen code Seth Alan Woolley (May 27)
- RE: Cisco's stolen code Ng, Kenneth (US) (May 27)
- Re: FW: Re: Cisco's stolen code Maarten (May 27)
- Re: FW: Re: Cisco's stolen code ktabic (May 28)