Full Disclosure mailing list archives
Re: M$ - so what should they do?
From: Valdis.Kletnieks () vt edu
Date: Mon, 21 Jun 2004 19:09:23 -0400
On Tue, 22 Jun 2004 09:04:37 +1200, "Stuart Fox (DSL AK)" <StuartF () datacom co nz> said:
No way! Am I the only person who still uses "copy con filename.txt" to create scripts and such at the command line? Please tell me I'm not?
I think the intent is that "con as a special filename in every directory" has to go away - you'd still be able to use copy c:\something\con filename.txt (Remember, us Unix people have had to use /dev/tty and /dev/null and /dev/zero for 3 decades, and never minded that 'tty', 'null', and 'zero' didn't exist in every single directory)....
Attachment:
_bin
Description:
Current thread:
- RE: M$ - so what should they do? Stuart Fox (DSL AK) (Jun 21)
- Re: M$ - so what should they do? Valdis . Kletnieks (Jun 21)
- Re: M$ - so what should they do? Todd Burroughs (Jun 22)
- Re: M$ - so what should they do? Valdis . Kletnieks (Jun 22)
- Re: M$ - so what should they do? Todd Burroughs (Jun 22)
- Re: M$ - so what should they do? Aditya, ALD [ Aditya Lalit Deshmukh ] (Jun 22)
- Re: M$ - so what should they do? Duncan Hill (Jun 22)
- Re: M$ - so what should they do? Mohit Muthanna (Jun 22)
- Re: M$ - so what should they do? Ciro Spider-Man (Jun 24)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: M$ - so what should they do? Stuart Fox (DSL AK) (Jun 21)
- RE: M$ - so what should they do? Stuart Fox (DSL AK) (Jun 21)
- RE: M$ - so what should they do? Eric Paynter (Jun 21)
- Re: M$ - so what should they do? tcleary2 (Jun 21)
(Thread continues...)
- Re: M$ - so what should they do? Valdis . Kletnieks (Jun 21)