RE: M$ - so what should they do?

["Stuart Fox \(DSL AK\)" <StuartF () datacom co nz>]

> How about changing the ".exe" convention?  Making a file 
> executable by it's "extension" probably causes a lot of 
> opportunities for problems, doesn't it?
>
> Also, the magic file names, like "CON" and "AUX" should go away.

No way!  Am I the only person who still uses "copy con filename.txt" to
create scripts and such at the command line?  Please tell me I'm not?

_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html