Full Disclosure mailing list archives
RE: Web sites compromised by IIS attack
From: Denis Dimick <denis () dimick net>
Date: Thu, 1 Jul 2004 08:01:49 -0700 (PDT)
Stuart, First off. Don't think I ever have been to support.m$.com don't think they have anything I'd ever want. Since I only use M$ for it's proper use, to play games, why would I care about support. Any REAL work I want to do is done under some flavor of Unix. As oon as someone gets CoD running under Linux, I'll go back to a single boot system. Denis On Thu, 1 Jul 2004, Stuart Fox (DSL AK) wrote:
Paul, If I'm understanding you correctly you don't understand Linux/Redhat. Or your just being silly to make a point. sendmail, wftp , php, etc.. are not owned by Redhat. Each of these applications are owned buy someone else and Redhat is allowed to re-distribute them.Yeah, but Redhat are the vendor, whether or not they actually wrote the software, they distributed it to you. Their product is Redhat Linux (the distribution), if that has a flaw in it they shouldn't get exempted just because they didn't write it. Could Microsoft then pass off support for ftp.exe for instance?And using the number of fixes/patches to an application as an indication of how god it is, is a bad thing. Using this logic you would have to say M$ is a good product.I believe you haven't looked at http://support.microsoft.com for a while? And besides, it was pretty clear that he wasn't using it as an indication of relative quality, just as an indicator of the fact that noone writes perfect software. _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
_______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
Current thread:
- Re: Web sites compromised by IIS attack, (continued)
- Re: Web sites compromised by IIS attack Denis Dimick (Jun 30)
- Re: Web sites compromised by IIS attack Aditya, ALD [ Aditya Lalit Deshmukh ] (Jun 30)
- Re: Web sites compromised by IIS attack Denis Dimick (Jun 30)
- Re: Web sites compromised by IIS attack (fully off topic!) Aditya, ALD [ Aditya Lalit Deshmukh ] (Jun 30)
- Re: Web sites compromised by IIS attack Valdis . Kletnieks (Jul 01)
- Re: Web sites compromised by IIS attack Raj Mathur (Jul 01)
- Re: Web sites compromised by IIS attack Maarten (Jul 01)
- Re: Web sites compromised by IIS attack Akos Szalkai (Jul 05)
- Re: Web sites compromised by IIS attack Denis Dimick (Jun 30)
- RE: Web sites compromised by IIS attack Stuart Fox (DSL AK) (Jun 30)
- RE: Web sites compromised by IIS attack Denis Dimick (Jul 01)
- RE: [OT] Web sites compromised by IIS attack Eric Paynter (Jul 01)
- Re: [OT] Web sites compromised by IIS attack codec (Jul 01)
- Re: [OT] Web sites compromised by IIS attack Denis Dimick (Jul 01)
- Re: [OT] Web sites compromised by IIS attack ken (Jul 01)
- Re: [OT] Web sites compromised by IIS attack Denis Dimick (Jul 01)
- Re: [OT] Web sites compromised by IIS attack Denis Dimick (Jul 01)
- RE: Web sites compromised by IIS attack Denis Dimick (Jul 01)
- Re: Web sites compromised by IIS attack Barry Fitzgerald (Jul 01)
- Re: Web sites compromised by IIS attack Denis Dimick (Jul 01)
- Re: Web sites compromised by IIS attack Barry Fitzgerald (Jul 02)