Full Disclosure mailing list archives
Re: FD should block attachments
From: Tim <tim-security () sentinelchicken org>
Date: Fri, 2 Apr 2004 12:07:08 -0800
attachments, html, silly corporate signatures, and what-not stripped
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ I wasn't talking about that kind of signature. I was talking about PGP/SMIME detached signatures. (eg, exist in attachments). tim _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
Current thread:
- FD should block attachments Michael Gale (Apr 01)
- Re: FD should block attachments John Sage (Apr 02)
- RE: FD should block attachments Aditya, ALD [Aditya Lalit Deshmukh] (Apr 02)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: FD should block attachments Zach Forsyth (Apr 01)
- RE: FD should block attachments Poof (Apr 02)
- RE: FD should block attachments Paul Schmehl (Apr 02)
- Re: FD should block attachments Tim (Apr 02)
- Re: FD should block attachments Mike Klinke (Apr 02)
- Re: FD should block attachments Tim (Apr 02)
- Re: FD should block attachments Valdis . Kletnieks (Apr 02)
- Re: FD should block attachments Tim (Apr 02)
- Re: FD should block attachments Paul Schmehl (Apr 02)
- Re: FD should block attachments Gregory A. Gilliss (Apr 02)
- RE: FD should block attachments Poof (Apr 02)
- Re: FD should block attachments Niek Baakman (Apr 02)
- Re: FD should block attachments Michael Cecil (Apr 02)
- Re: FD should block attachments Paul Schmehl (Apr 02)
- RE: FD should block attachments Poof (Apr 02)
- Re: FD should block attachments Niek Baakman (Apr 03)
- Re: FD should block attachments petard (Apr 02)