Full Disclosure mailing list archives
Re: FD should block attachments
From: Paul Schmehl <pauls () utdallas edu>
Date: Fri, 02 Apr 2004 19:51:26 -0600
--On Saturday, April 3, 2004 2:30 AM +0200 Niek Baakman <niekbaakman () home nl> wrote:
You're the second person that has suggested this. I'm amazed by the insensitivity. If the shoe was on the other foot, would you be content to peruse the archives?They have the choice not to sign up, and read the FD archives instead. If you can't deal with the noise/virii/ect/ect that comes with an unmoderated list, unsubscribe right now!
Paul Schmehl (pauls () utdallas edu) Adjunct Information Security Officer The University of Texas at Dallas AVIEN Founding Member http://www.utdallas.edu _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
Current thread:
- RE: FD should block attachments, (continued)
- RE: FD should block attachments Paul Schmehl (Apr 02)
- Re: FD should block attachments Tim (Apr 02)
- Re: FD should block attachments Mike Klinke (Apr 02)
- Re: FD should block attachments Tim (Apr 02)
- Re: FD should block attachments Valdis . Kletnieks (Apr 02)
- Re: FD should block attachments Tim (Apr 02)
- Re: FD should block attachments Paul Schmehl (Apr 02)
- Re: FD should block attachments Gregory A. Gilliss (Apr 02)
- Re: FD should block attachments Niek Baakman (Apr 02)
- Re: FD should block attachments Michael Cecil (Apr 02)
- Re: FD should block attachments Paul Schmehl (Apr 02)
- RE: FD should block attachments Poof (Apr 02)
- Re: FD should block attachments Niek Baakman (Apr 03)
- Re: FD should block attachments petard (Apr 02)
- Re: [FD] FD should block attachments Andrew J Caines (Apr 02)
- Re: Re: [FD] FD should block attachments morning_wood (Apr 02)
- Re: Re: [FD] FD should block attachments Luke Norman (Apr 02)
- RE: FD should block attachments Sean Crawford (Apr 03)
- Re: FD should block attachments Michael Gale (Apr 03)