Full Disclosure mailing list archives
Re: Coding securely, was Linux (in)security
From: Sebastian Herbst <pz () psychozapp de>
Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2003 17:19:41 +0100
I just said "it is possible", i never said "it is a good idea" oder "it is well worth the expenses". But if you see open source software analogous to math, it would perhaps make sense to do this with some smaller OS-independent libraries. -- /~\ The ASCII Sebastian Herbst \ / Ribbon Campaign pz () psychozapp de X Against HTML / \ Email! D90E 548A F4F9 5C1E 67E5 06A7 C426 3827 1568 206D
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Current thread:
- Re: Coding securely, was Linux (in)security, (continued)
- Re: Coding securely, was Linux (in)security Brett Hutley (Oct 26)
- RE: Coding securely, was Linux (in)security Chris Eagle (Oct 26)
- RE: Coding securely, was Linux (in)security Steve Wray (Oct 27)
- Re: Coding securely, was Linux (in)security Gregory A. Gilliss (Oct 27)
- Re: Coding securely, was Linux (in)security Valdis . Kletnieks (Oct 28)
- Re: Coding securely, was Linux (in)security Gregory Steuck (Oct 28)
- Re: Coding securely, was Linux (in)security Valdis . Kletnieks (Oct 29)
- Re: Coding securely, was Linux (in)security Ben Laurie (Oct 29)
- Re: Coding securely, was Linux (in)security Sebastian Herbst (Oct 29)
- Re: Coding securely, was Linux (in)security Valdis . Kletnieks (Oct 29)
- Re: Coding securely, was Linux (in)security Sebastian Herbst (Oct 29)
- Re: Coding securely, was Linux (in)security Bill Royds (Oct 29)
- RE: Coding securely, was Linux (in)security Steve Wray (Oct 29)
- Re: Coding securely, was Linux (in)security Brett Hutley (Oct 29)
- Re: Coding securely, was Linux (in)security VeNoMouS (Oct 29)
- Re: Coding securely, was Linux (in)security Valdis . Kletnieks (Oct 29)
- Re: Coding securely, was Linux (in)security Ben Laurie (Oct 30)
- Re: Coding securely, was Linux (in)security Bill Royds (Oct 29)
- Re: [inbox] Re: RE: Linux (in)security Sebastian Niehaus (Oct 24)