Full Disclosure mailing list archives
Re: AT&T early warning system
From: "jkm" <jkmanowar9 () fastmail fm>
Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2003 20:25:09 -0800
On Fri, 17 Oct 2003 23:28:44 -0400 (EDT), "Jay Sulzberger" <jays () panix com> said:
I am glad that a telephone company is working to bring the InterWeb under the same sort of statistical oversight as the telphone net was under circa 1950. Even the crudest of old fashioned traffic analysis, and the most elementary precautions against massive channeled scabland packet flows would have stopped most of the recent worm annoyances. oo--JS.
I'm interested in the technical aspect of it all. Is AT&T going to start simple port blocking, or whatever I didn't think of, against worms which might interfere with what legit ports that might be open. Would love to know what they have in mind for this Internet Protect and its implementation. Ok, I've got to read up on what happened in the 1950s for the telephone network since I wasn't even born then. :) -- jkm jkmanowar9 () fastmail fm -- http://www.fastmail.fm - Faster than the air-speed velocity of an unladen european swallow _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
Current thread:
- AT&T early warning system jkm (Oct 17)
- Re: AT&T early warning system Jay Sulzberger (Oct 17)
- Re: AT&T early warning system jkm (Oct 17)
- Re: AT&T early warning system Hoho (Oct 18)
- Re: AT&T early warning system S G Masood (Oct 18)
- Re: AT&T early warning system jkm (Oct 19)
- RE: AT&T early warning system Steve Wray (Oct 18)
- RE: AT&T early warning system S G Masood (Oct 18)
- Re: AT&T early warning system Sascha Teifke (Oct 18)
- RE: AT&T early warning system Bruce Ediger (Oct 18)
- Re: AT&T early warning system S G Masood (Oct 18)
- Re: AT&T early warning system jkm (Oct 19)
- RE: AT&T early warning system Steve Wray (Oct 19)
- Re: AT&T early warning system Jimmy Alderson (Oct 22)
- Re: AT&T early warning system Jay Sulzberger (Oct 17)