Full Disclosure mailing list archives
AT&T early warning system
From: "jkm" <jkmanowar9 () fastmail fm>
Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2003 18:44:21 -0800
The related link: http://www.nwfusion.com/news/2003/0929att.html Quote 1: "With Internet Protect, AT&T will use internally developed traffic analysis tools to look for anomalies such as traffic spikes, traffic drop-offs and unusual protocols in use." Quote 2: "AT&T saw anomalies in its network three to four weeks before that worm hit and was able to take certain precautions. "When the worm actually happened, AT&T's network did not take a hit,'' Eslambolchi said." Does anybody know or has worked with this Internet Protect, AT&T is now pushing as the next big thing. And I question whether quote 2 happened exactly as Eslambolchi said. For the network gurus, will traffic analysis prevent all or most attacks be it worms or otherwise? My current view is that it is not a catchall and the traffic anaylsis might also be used by AT&T for other stuff like what Verisign did recently to sell more products or such. What do u think? -- jkm jkmanowar9 () fastmail fm -- http://www.fastmail.fm - Email service worth paying for. Try it for free _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
Current thread:
- AT&T early warning system jkm (Oct 17)
- Re: AT&T early warning system Jay Sulzberger (Oct 17)
- Re: AT&T early warning system jkm (Oct 17)
- Re: AT&T early warning system Hoho (Oct 18)
- Re: AT&T early warning system S G Masood (Oct 18)
- Re: AT&T early warning system jkm (Oct 19)
- RE: AT&T early warning system Steve Wray (Oct 18)
- RE: AT&T early warning system S G Masood (Oct 18)
- Re: AT&T early warning system Sascha Teifke (Oct 18)
- RE: AT&T early warning system Bruce Ediger (Oct 18)
- Re: AT&T early warning system S G Masood (Oct 18)
- Re: AT&T early warning system jkm (Oct 19)
- Re: AT&T early warning system Jay Sulzberger (Oct 17)