Full Disclosure mailing list archives
Re: About spamb strange characters
From: "Nexus" <nexus () patrol i-way co uk>
Date: Tue, 13 May 2003 17:31:59 +0100
----- Original Message ----- From: <vogt () hansenet com> [snip]
You should see what finds its way into the abuse@ account. If the quality of abuse reports were better, more could be done about it. I have seen:
Being an ex sysadmin, recognise them - you missed the complaints from recipients of spoofed MAIL FROM: emails ;-) That said, surely it is not unreasonable to expect at least a response from a technically accurate and reasoned complaint that includes the original spam with headers complete and intact ? Some ISP's will aggressively check their own netblocks for open relays - I know mine does and that some people think of it as a nuisance - but if you are savvy enough to set up a sane MTA, then you are savvy enough the blackhole the relay checks, so no big deal really. Except of course the *really* dumb ones that just look for the 550 response rather than receiving the relayed mail itself but we are then back into the domain [sic] of dummies again.
So the problem is that dummies complaining about other dummies clog up the pipes. Solution? I don't know, maybe shoot all the dummies.
How about a "fit to use the internet" licence like you have for driving or flying ? Or owning a firearm.... nah, forget that one...... Cheers. _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
Current thread:
- AW: About spamb strange characters vogt (May 13)
- Re: About spamb strange characters Nexus (May 13)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- AW: About spamb strange characters vogt (May 14)
- AW: About spamb strange characters vogt (May 14)