Full Disclosure mailing list archives

Re: About spamb strange characters


From: "Nexus" <nexus () patrol i-way co uk>
Date: Tue, 13 May 2003 17:31:59 +0100


----- Original Message ----- 
From: <vogt () hansenet com>

[snip]

You should see what finds its way into the abuse@ account. If the quality
of abuse reports were better, more could be done about it. I have seen:

Being an ex sysadmin, recognise them - you missed the complaints from
recipients of spoofed MAIL FROM: emails ;-)
That said, surely it is not unreasonable to expect at least a response from
a technically accurate and reasoned complaint that includes the original
spam with headers complete and intact ?
Some ISP's will aggressively check their own netblocks for open relays - I
know mine does and that some people think of it as a nuisance - but if you
are savvy enough to set up a sane MTA, then you are savvy enough the
blackhole the relay checks, so no big deal really.
Except of course the *really* dumb ones that just look for the 550 response
rather than receiving the relayed mail itself but we are then back into the
domain [sic] of dummies again.

So the problem is that dummies complaining about other dummies clog up
the pipes. Solution? I don't know, maybe shoot all the dummies.

How about a "fit to use the internet" licence like you have for driving or
flying ?
Or owning a firearm.... nah, forget that one......

Cheers.

_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html


Current thread: