Full Disclosure mailing list archives
Re: PGP vs. certificate from Verisign
From: Shawn McMahon <smcmahon () eiv com>
Date: Fri, 9 May 2003 15:42:52 -0400
On Fri, May 09, 2003 at 02:57:44PM -0400, Valdis.Kletnieks () vt edu said:
(Personally, I use PGP because the whole IETF/NANOG/security community is fairly small and closed (perhaps 10K people, tops?), and PGP is a better fit than X.509, which is which is designed for hundreds of millions of users that you've never heard of before, and will never hear from again).
I use both, depending on to whom I'm sending the email, but I use PGP by default. -- Shawn McMahon | Let every nation know, whether it wishes us well or ill, EIV Consulting | that we shall pay any price, bear any burden, meet any UNIX and Linux | hardship, support any friend, oppose any foe, to assure http://www.eiv.com| the survival and the success of liberty. - JFK
Attachment:
_bin
Description:
Current thread:
- PGP vs. certificate from Verisign Kamal Habayeb (May 09)
- Re: PGP vs. certificate from Verisign Valdis . Kletnieks (May 09)
- Re: PGP vs. certificate from Verisign Shawn McMahon (May 09)
- Re: PGP vs. certificate from Verisign Scott M. Algatt (May 09)
- Re: PGP vs. certificate from Verisign Anne Carasik (May 09)
- Re: PGP vs. certificate from Verisign Georgi Guninski (May 10)
- RE: PGP vs. certificate from Verisign Kamal Habayeb (May 10)
- Re: PGP vs. certificate from Verisign Steve Poirot (May 10)
- Re: PGP vs. certificate from Verisign Derek Atkins (May 10)
- Re: PGP vs. certificate from Verisign Ben Laurie (May 10)
- Re: PGP vs. certificate from Verisign Jason (May 10)
- Re: PGP vs. certificate from Verisign yossarian (May 10)
- [OFFTOPIC] PGP vs. certificate from Verisign Kurt Seifried (May 10)
- Re: PGP vs. certificate from Verisign Valdis . Kletnieks (May 09)