Full Disclosure mailing list archives
PGP vs. certificate from Verisign
From: "Kamal Habayeb" <mountainfury () hotmail com>
Date: Fri, 9 May 2003 13:22:27 -0500
Greetings, I'm trying to get some expert opinions on which is better. Using Outlook 2002, would it be better to use PGP to encrypt messages or use the built-in option with a digital certificate from Verisign (or some other CA)? Thanks, Kamal _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
Current thread:
- PGP vs. certificate from Verisign Kamal Habayeb (May 09)
- Re: PGP vs. certificate from Verisign Valdis . Kletnieks (May 09)
- Re: PGP vs. certificate from Verisign Shawn McMahon (May 09)
- Re: PGP vs. certificate from Verisign Scott M. Algatt (May 09)
- Re: PGP vs. certificate from Verisign Anne Carasik (May 09)
- Re: PGP vs. certificate from Verisign Georgi Guninski (May 10)
- RE: PGP vs. certificate from Verisign Kamal Habayeb (May 10)
- Re: PGP vs. certificate from Verisign Steve Poirot (May 10)
- Re: PGP vs. certificate from Verisign Derek Atkins (May 10)
- Re: PGP vs. certificate from Verisign Ben Laurie (May 10)
- Re: PGP vs. certificate from Verisign Jason (May 10)
(Thread continues...)
- Re: PGP vs. certificate from Verisign Valdis . Kletnieks (May 09)