Full Disclosure mailing list archives
Re: Adminstrivia: Digest Limits/Netiquette
From: Valdis.Kletnieks () vt edu
Date: Fri, 27 Jun 2003 14:05:07 -0400
On Fri, 27 Jun 2003 12:23:47 +1300, Nick FitzGerald <nick () virus-l demon co uk> said:
I'm fully in favour of "quoted-line to new content" ratio moderation. Simply bounce any message with more quoted lines than non-quoted, or whatever more or less harsh ratio you think is reasonable. Messages without "substantial" new content relative to quoted content are generally (like 95-99%) not worth the bandwidth, storage space or deletion time they "consume".
You do, of course, realize that sometimes a one-line "read THIS url" suffices? That's when you start seeing slash-dot style padding that's there just to make more new lines than original. Now I've got a 50/50 ratio. Barely.
Attachment:
_bin
Description:
Current thread:
- Adminstrivia: Digest Limits/Netiquette Len Rose (Jun 26)
- Re: Adminstrivia: Digest Limits/Netiquette Nick FitzGerald (Jun 26)
- RE: Adminstrivia: Digest Limits/Netiquette Curt Purdy (Jun 27)
- Re: Adminstrivia: Digest Limits/Netiquette Valdis . Kletnieks (Jun 27)
- Re: Adminstrivia: Digest Limits/Netiquette Roy S. Rapoport (Jun 27)
- Re: Adminstrivia: Digest Limits/Netiquette Troy (Jun 27)
- Re: Adminstrivia: Digest Limits/Netiquette Valdis . Kletnieks (Jun 27)
- Re: Adminstrivia: Digest Limits/Netiquette Shawn McMahon (Jun 27)
- Re: Adminstrivia: Digest Limits/Netiquette Nick FitzGerald (Jun 27)
- Re: Adminstrivia: Digest Limits/Netiquette Nick FitzGerald (Jun 26)
- Re: Adminstrivia: Digest Limits/Netiquette Frank Tobin (Jun 27)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: Adminstrivia: Digest Limits/Netiquette Schmehl, Paul L (Jun 27)