Full Disclosure mailing list archives
Re: AW: Windows Messenger Popup Spam on UDP Port 10 26
From: Gabe Arnold <f0x () squirrelsoup net>
Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2003 11:07:27 -0400
I run off of RCN and they have recently blocked all outgoing port 25 traffic unless someone buys a static IP for another $20 a month. Although I agree that blocking 25 outgoing is nice, I pay for internet access, not for access only through certain ports. Due to the nature of my setup, I was getting a static IP anyways, but I think the $20 bucks is a lot. In the end the decision was deal with port 80 and 25 blocks or pay 20 a month. I pay the 20, but I think I'm getting nailed in the ass. --Gabe * Nils Ketelsen (nils.ketelsen () kuehne-nagel com) wrote:
At 11:16 23.06.2003 +0200, vogt () hansenet com wrote:A professional ISP does not block any port. Blocking ports can only be done on the customer side. The ISP does not know which port i might need.This isn't about you. The ISP also has a responsibility to protect the internet at large. If millions of spam are sent each day because the average user is too stupid to close off his proxy, then the ISP can either shut him down, or block the proxy port. Obviously, shutting down isn't an option for business reasons.In this case I would request all ISPs to block port 25. Millions of spams are sent via this port each day. Nils _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
_______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
Current thread:
- Re: AW: Windows Messenger Popup Spam on UDP Port 10 26 Nils Ketelsen (Jun 23)
- Re: AW: Windows Messenger Popup Spam on UDP Port 10 26 Gabe Arnold (Jun 23)