RE: Destroying PCs remotely?

["Myers, Marvin" <MRMyers () anteon com>]

You have missed the point, we are trying to make an example of these
types of scofflaws. You have to smash the windshield before you have any
proof that the person was going to cut you off. That way other people
would not be inclined to cut you off because of the example that you
have created. Nowhere does Mr. Hatch define what proof he would use as
evidence to destroy these computers or allow any defense. Guilty and
executed before even being able to try to prove your innocence. Way to
go ORRIN.

-----Original Message-----
From: Golomb, Gary [mailto:GGolomb () enterasys com] 
Sent: Wednesday, June 18, 2003 1:16 PM
To: full-disclosure () lists netsys com
Subject: RE: [Full-disclosure] Destroying PCs remotely?


> > "Senator Orrin Hatch, a Republican representing Utah, asked
> > technology chiefs about whether they could develop ways to
> > damage or destroy the computers hearing in Washington on Tuesday"

Alright, now we're talking!!! Marshal law! Next time I see someone
change lanes without using their turn signal, I'm going to follow them
and smash-in their windshield... 

_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html