Full Disclosure mailing list archives
RE: Administrivia: Poll
From: "James Jacobs" <jjacobs () Radford edu>
Date: Thu, 12 Jun 2003 13:00:56 -0400
-----Original Message----- From: full-disclosure-admin () lists netsys com [mailto:full-disclosure-admin () lists netsys com] On Behalf Of Nick FitzGerald Sent: Thursday, June 12, 2003 6:14 AM To: full-disclosure () lists netsys com Subject: Re: [Full-disclosure] Administrivia: Poll "morning_wood" <se_cur_ity () hotmail com> wrote:
You could have just asked people to vote instead of pointing out a negative. I would prefer an unbiased judgement. But by stating the above, you
imply to
the general list that I already have done "bad" in some way.
Whilst -- gulp -- in general I agree with this observation of yours, the fact that enough folk have asked the list admins to address your "situation" that they have been "driven" to do this does, in fact, mean you have "done bad". Unfortunately for you, your ego is such that you saw the mainly no-names encouraging you to continue posting as evidence you were "doing good" (or at least "not bad"), rather than properly weighting the commentary of those suggesting you desist. (And no, much as on average I find your posts irritating, clueless, and largely irrelevant and childish, I was not one of the complainers. After all, there's a Delete key on this keyboard, my Email client listens to it and if you continue to get worse I can even go the further step of filtering out your messages...) Regards, Nick FitzGerald -------------------------- What do you mean the list admins have been driven to this? They can just as easily delete all the unwanted "Kick morning wood" emails that they get just as easily as we can delete all of morning wood's emails if we wish. There's no need for voting to moderate someone on an unmoderated list. If morning wood is indeed silenced then this list should no longer be considered moderated and those of us who joined because it stated that it was un-moderated should unsubscribe. I don't think the flamers realize that if wood get's moderated then they will get moderated as well, and if they are not then something is seriously wrong with this list. This is my first post to the list, and I'm ashamed that it had to be on this topic. _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
Current thread:
- Administrivia: Poll Len Rose (Jun 11)
- Re: Administrivia: Poll northern snowfall (Jun 11)
- Re: Administrivia: Poll KF (Jun 11)
- Re: Administrivia: Poll Nexus (Jun 12)
- Re: Administrivia: Poll morning_wood (Jun 11)
- Re: Administrivia: Poll Nick FitzGerald (Jun 12)
- Re: Administrivia: Poll morning_wood (Jun 12)
- RE: Administrivia: Poll James Jacobs (Jun 12)
- Re: Administrivia: Poll Nick FitzGerald (Jun 12)
- RE: Administrivia: Poll Ed Carp (Jun 11)
- Re: Administrivia: Poll morning_wood (Jun 12)
- Re: Administrivia: Poll Peter van den Heuvel (Jun 12)
- Re: Administrivia: Poll David Bernick (Jun 12)
- Re: Administrivia: Poll S . f . Stover (Jun 12)
- Re: Administrivia: Poll Shawn McMahon (Jun 12)
- Re: Administrivia: Poll Martin Ekendahl (Jun 12)
- Re: Administrivia: Poll noconflic (Jun 12)
- Re: Administrivia: Poll Paul M. Hirsch (Jun 12)
- The point, kids. Mike Fratto (Jun 12)
(Thread continues...)
- Re: Administrivia: Poll northern snowfall (Jun 11)