Full Disclosure mailing list archives
Re: hackers are evil?
From: madsaxon <madsaxon () direcway com>
Date: Thu, 12 Jun 2003 11:49:22 -0500
[Since nothing appears to be "off topic" for this list, I don't feel constrained to withhold my comments on that basis.] At 01:21 AM 6/13/03 +1000, Darren Reed wrote:
The english language evolves and this is just part of it. Just as "jelly" in the USA is different to "jelly" in Australia, "hacker" post circa 1990 is different to "hacker" pre circa 1990.
Oh, so "Fosters" is, in fact, Australian for "beer?" I guess I'm not ready to have the language I employ every day of my life dictated by the mass media. The evolution of language is conducted by consensus of the users, but in this case that consensus has been artificially promulgated not by a preponderance of the speakers, but by a very small minority who are supposed to be in the business of informing. If that doesn't bother you, fine. It does me. If "hacker" were the only instance of this phenomenon, I'd just write it off as an anomaly. It isn't, however. There are many examples, some obvious, some rather more subtle. We all have causes for which we're prepared to fight... m5x _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
Current thread:
- hackers are evil? morning_wood (Jun 11)
- Re: hackers are evil? David M. Wilson (Jun 12)
- Re: hackers are evil? Darren Reed (Jun 12)
- Re: hackers are evil? Zen (Jun 12)
- Re: hackers are evil? madsaxon (Jun 12)
- Re: hackers are evil? gml (Jun 12)