Full Disclosure mailing list archives
Re: kaspersky-labs webserver or listserver compromised?
From: Ka <ka () khidr net>
Date: Fri, 8 Nov 2002 17:13:51 +0100
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 At Freitag, 8. November 2002 16:20 Brian McWilliams wrote:
Man, we would be lost without these early warning systems.
Hehe. .o) In this case we wouldn't get the virusses without them. That was a clear home-run for the anti-security-industry folks. I wonder whether we get the newest virus or the DB updates from Kaspersky first the next time. I'd say they owe each member of their list a free one-year subscription of one of their products. Or at least a bottle of vodka. Nastrovje! Ka - -- Marketing is the art to sell things, which the customers wouldn't need without it. http://www.khidr.net/users/ka/pgpkey.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux) Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org iD8DBQE9y+LQ72vu22ltWBERAn7UAJ4nmTX+S99fXTFGFHWUvr4UdcoHTgCghRc+ gJQjOhN7TOvAtTvL4QrBWKk= =i7z/ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
Current thread:
- kaspersky-labs webserver or listserver compromised? Ka (Nov 07)
- Re: kaspersky-labs webserver or listserver compromised? Andreas Tirok (Nov 08)
- Re: kaspersky-labs webserver or listserver com Nick FitzGerald (Nov 08)
- Re: kaspersky-labs webserver or listserver com Ka (Nov 08)
- Re: kaspersky-labs webserver or listserver compromised? Ka (Nov 08)
- Re: kaspersky-labs webserver or listserver com Nick FitzGerald (Nov 08)
- Re: kaspersky-labs webserver or listserver compromised? Brian McWilliams (Nov 08)
- Re: kaspersky-labs webserver or listserver compromised? Ka (Nov 08)
- Kaspersky blames "massive attack" Brian McWilliams (Nov 08)
- Re: kaspersky-labs webserver or listserver compromised? Ka (Nov 08)
- Re: kaspersky-labs webserver or listserver compromised? Andreas Tirok (Nov 08)