IDS mailing list archives
Re: Skype & IPS vendor claims
From: Vladimir Parkhaev <vladimir () arobas net>
Date: Tue, 16 May 2006 13:27:39 -0400
Quoting Matt Jonkman (mjonkman () infotex com):
What these vendors may be doing it trying to block access to centralized login or directory servers by known IP ranges... I don't know if that'll be completely effective.
If I understand the protocol correctly, central servers are contacted only on a first run (after install). I(D|P)S systems can have sigs with IP addresses of those servers, but if user X installs Skype client on his corp. laptop at home... it doesn't help much. -- .signature: No such file or directory ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Test Your IDS Is your IDS deployed correctly? Find out quickly and easily by testing it with real-world attacks from CORE IMPACT. Go to http://www.securityfocus.com/sponsor/CoreSecurity_focus-ids_040708 to learn more. ------------------------------------------------------------------------
Current thread:
- Skype & IPS vendor claims Vladimir Parkhaev (May 16)
- Re: Skype & IPS vendor claims Jackie Lai (May 17)
- Re: Skype & IPS vendor claims Kevin (May 17)
- Message not available
- Re: Skype & IPS vendor claims Vladimir Parkhaev (May 17)
- Re: Skype & IPS vendor claims Matt Jonkman (May 17)
- Re: Skype & IPS vendor claims Vladimir Parkhaev (May 17)
- Re: Skype & IPS vendor claims Matt Jonkman (May 17)
- Re: Skype & IPS vendor claims Vladimir Parkhaev (May 17)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: Skype & IPS vendor claims John Brightwell (May 17)
- Re: Skype & IPS vendor claims Jason Haar (May 18)
- Re: Skype & IPS vendor claims ROB DIXON (May 17)
- Re: Skype & IPS vendor claims Christian Kreibich (May 18)
- Re: Skype & IPS vendor claims Matt Jonkman (May 18)
- RE: Skype & IPS vendor claims William Bell (May 18)
- RE: Skype & IPS vendor claims Dante Mercurio (May 18)
- RE: Skype & IPS vendor claims okolesnikov (May 18)
- RE: Skype & IPS vendor claims Basgen, Brian (May 19)