IDS mailing list archives
RE: [inbox] Re: Counter detect Network Sniffer
From: "Rob Shein" <shoten () starpower net>
Date: Mon, 1 Mar 2004 14:19:43 -0500
Actually, this isn't true. There are a number of things that can be done to avoid detection, like using an IP address that isn't on the correct subnet; all the methods I've seen for promiscuous-mode detection require the ability to communicate with the sniffing system. Ultimately, if the person sniffing is somewhat clever (and/or paranoid), it'll be trivial for them to evade detection as long as they don't want to make use of their system for normal usage at the same time.
-----Original Message----- From: Curt Purdy [mailto:purdy () tecman com] Sent: Monday, March 01, 2004 1:51 PM To: 'Vel'; 'Rob Shein'; 'gatekeeper'; focus-ids () securityfocus com Subject: RE: [inbox] Re: Counter detect Network Sniffer Vel wrote:How can a sniffer be run in non-promiscuous mode ?<snip>It may also not work if sniffer was ran non-promiscuously (i.e. snoop -P)? Is there a way to detect such sniffers? Thanks.You can run in promiscuose mode without fear of detection by cutting the TX wires 1&2 leaving only your RX wires. This is actually my preferred method of running an IDS to evade detection. Curt Purdy CISSP, GSEC, MCSE+I, CNE, CCDA Information Security Engineer DP Solutions ---------------------------------------- If you spend more on coffee than on IT security, you will be hacked. What's more, you deserve to be hacked. -- White House cybersecurity adviser Richard Clarke
--------------------------------------------------------------------------- Free 30-day trial: firewall with virus/spam protection, URL filtering, VPN, wireless security Protect your network against hackers, viruses, spam and other risks with Astaro Security Linux, the comprehensive security solution that combines six applications in one software solution for ease of use and lower total cost of ownership. Download your free trial at http://www.securityfocus.com/sponsor/Astaro_focus-ids_040301 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Current thread:
- RE: Counter detect Network Sniffer Rob Shein (Mar 01)
- Re: Counter detect Network Sniffer Vel (Mar 01)
- Re: Counter detect Network Sniffer Tillman Hodgson (Mar 01)
- RE: [inbox] Re: Counter detect Network Sniffer Curt Purdy (Mar 01)
- RE: [inbox] Re: Counter detect Network Sniffer Rob Shein (Mar 01)
- RE: [inbox] Re: Counter detect Network Sniffer Curt Purdy (Mar 01)
- Re: Counter detect Network Sniffer Tod Beardsley (Mar 02)
- RE: [inbox] Re: Counter detect Network Sniffer Rob Shein (Mar 02)
- Re: [inbox] Re: Counter detect Network Sniffer Thomas Ptacek (Mar 01)
- Re: Counter detect Network Sniffer Vel (Mar 01)
- Re: Counter detect Network Sniffer Sandro Melo (Mar 02)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Counter detect Network Sniffer Mike Frantzen (Mar 01)