IDS mailing list archives
Re: port bonding and taps
From: "Sam f. Stover" <sstover () iwc sytexinc com>
Date: Thu, 2 Oct 2003 11:34:23 -0400
On Thursday, October 2, 2003, at 11:00 AM, PPowenski () oag com wrote:
I am using channel bonding with RH 9 and it works great
That's awesome - could you let us know what kind of bandwidth you are handling? I looked at this some time ago, but had some real concerns about what kind of traffic it could handle. I never really put it to the test though, so I can't speak authoritatively.
Also, is there a way to know if you are dropping frames on the bonded interface? Or do you have to query the individual card statistics, just like anything else?
____ S.f.Stover sstover () iwc sytexinc com
Attachment:
PGP.sig
Description:
Current thread:
- port bonding and taps John Flynn (Oct 02)
- Re: port bonding and taps Bamm Visscher (Oct 02)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: port bonding and taps Jeffrey . Stebelton (Oct 02)
- Re: port bonding and taps Michael Stone (Oct 02)
- Re: port bonding and taps Sam f. Stover (Oct 02)
- Re: port bonding and taps Bamm Visscher (Oct 06)
- RE: port bonding and taps PPowenski (Oct 02)
- Re: port bonding and taps Sam f. Stover (Oct 02)
- Re: port bonding and taps Bennett Todd (Oct 06)
- Re: port bonding and taps Sam f. Stover (Oct 06)
- Re: port bonding and taps Bennett Todd (Oct 06)
- Re: port bonding and taps Sam f. Stover (Oct 06)
- Re: port bonding and taps Sam f. Stover (Oct 02)