Firewall Wizards mailing list archives
Re: PIX 515 7.1 vs: 8.0
From: Brian Blater <brb.lists () gmail com>
Date: Sat, 19 Mar 2011 21:56:23 -0400
On Sat, Mar 19, 2011 at 7:48 AM, John Morrison <john.morrison101 () gmail com> wrote:
Brian, The PIX guide (http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/security/pix/pix70/hw/installation/guide/515.html) says both the 4FE and 4FE-66 can be used with the unrestricted feature license. A maximum of 6 ports can be used (2 built-in plus the 4FE). On the 4FE the ports are numbered 2, 3, 4, 5 from left to right. The info for the 4FE (http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/hw/vpndevc/ps2030/products_data_sheet09186a0080189f0a.html) says it is fine in the 515/515E. The VAC and VAC+ also can be used. 128MB RAM is enough for the features. Only the VAC appears to require at least v6.3 It sounds right.
Thank you for setting me on the right path John. For some reason, I thought the ports were number right to left (thinking port 2 was closest to the PCI slot. However, I learned something new today, it is the other way around. So now I have the DMZ port working with the 4FE-66 card. Thanks for everyone patience with me on this one. Again, you just have to got back the basics and think of what the simplest problem could be. Brian _______________________________________________ firewall-wizards mailing list firewall-wizards () listserv icsalabs com https://listserv.icsalabs.com/mailman/listinfo/firewall-wizards
Current thread:
- PIX 515 7.1 vs: 8.0 Brian Blater (Mar 11)
- Re: PIX 515 7.1 vs: 8.0 John Morrison (Mar 15)
- Re: PIX 515 7.1 vs: 8.0 Christopher J. Wargaski (Mar 15)
- Re: PIX 515 7.1 vs: 8.0 Kevin Horvath (Mar 17)
- Re: PIX 515 7.1 vs: 8.0 Brian Blater (Mar 19)
- Re: PIX 515 7.1 vs: 8.0 Christopher J. Wargaski (Mar 22)
- Re: PIX 515 7.1 vs: 8.0 Brian Blater (Mar 22)
- Re: PIX 515 7.1 vs: 8.0 Christopher J. Wargaski (Mar 22)
- Re: PIX 515 7.1 vs: 8.0 Kevin Horvath (Mar 17)
- Re: PIX 515 7.1 vs: 8.0 John Morrison (Mar 22)
- Re: PIX 515 7.1 vs: 8.0 Brian Blater (Mar 22)