Firewall Wizards mailing list archives
Re: Gartner as usual..
From: ArkanoiD <ark () eltex net>
Date: Sat, 22 May 2010 03:06:22 +0400
..and people keep asking me privately "what's wrong with gartner?" What's right with it? Being not just clueless, but agressively ignorant, Gartner reports are not just bad, they are *evil* (due to wag the dog effect). Recommended reading to clarify the terms "evil" and "ignorant": http://www.zdnet.com/blog/threatchaos/ciphertrust-buys-secure-computing/369 http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/33391 Not surprising both guys are former Gartner employees? On Fri, May 21, 2010 at 03:10:12AM +0400, ArkanoiD wrote:
http://www.paloaltonetworks.com/literature/whitepapers/Gartner-Magic-Quadrant2010.pdf ..pure, organic, unblended BULLSHIT. _______________________________________________ firewall-wizards mailing list firewall-wizards () listserv icsalabs com https://listserv.icsalabs.com/mailman/listinfo/firewall-wizards email protected and scanned by AdvascanTM - keeping email useful - www.advascan.com
_______________________________________________ firewall-wizards mailing list firewall-wizards () listserv icsalabs com https://listserv.icsalabs.com/mailman/listinfo/firewall-wizards
Current thread:
- Gartner as usual.. ArkanoiD (May 20)
- Re: Gartner as usual.. ArkanoiD (May 23)
- Re: Gartner as usual.. Paul Melson (May 23)
- Re: Gartner as usual.. Potter, Albert (Al) (May 24)
- Re: Gartner as usual.. Victor Williams (May 23)
- Re: Gartner as usual.. ArkanoiD (May 23)