Firewall Wizards mailing list archives
Re: Firewall scaling
From: sin <sin () pvs ro>
Date: Wed, 27 Jun 2007 12:57:41 +0300
Sami Ghourabi wrote:
Hi List, I'm trying to convince management that a firewall that supports 32000 concurrent sessions is enough for an organization that has a single WAN internet link, and about 60-100 users, but I'm lacking arguments.
it depends very much what the traffic pattern for those users is. it's not that hard to generate 32k connections with 100 pcs :)
What do you think about that statement? Are there any rational methods available for firewall performance scaling (concurrent sessions, new sessions per second, throughput, etc.) Any answer/resource appreciated.
_______________________________________________ firewall-wizards mailing list firewall-wizards () listserv icsalabs com https://listserv.icsalabs.com/mailman/listinfo/firewall-wizards
Current thread:
- Firewall scaling Sami Ghourabi (Jun 26)
- Re: Firewall scaling Marcus J. Ranum (Jun 27)
- Re: Firewall scaling sin (Jun 27)
- Re: Firewall scaling jason (Jun 27)
- Re: Firewall scaling Pollock, Joseph (Jun 27)
- Re: Firewall scaling jason (Jun 27)
- Re: Firewall scaling K K (Jun 27)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Firewall scaling rgolodner (Jun 27)
- Re: Firewall scaling Ian Searle (Jun 27)
- Re: Firewall scaling Keith A. Glass (Jun 27)