Firewall Wizards mailing list archives
Re: X server in a Firewall
From: Carson Gaspar <carson () taltos org>
Date: Wed, 25 Jan 2006 02:07:48 -0500
--On Tuesday, January 24, 2006 10:23 PM -0500 "Marcus J. Ranum" <mjr () ranum com> wrote:
Paul D. Robertson wrote:Indeed, that's why console-only access is the best method.Indeed; if your firewall rulesets change so often that you find it onerous to walk down the hall to the console, then your firewall ruleset is changing too often, which probably means you are already in a state of screwed.
Or "down the hall" involves a 13 hour flight to Tokyo...if you're lucky. If not, you might have to transfer to go to a branch office.
And no, I'm not exaggerating. Of course, more folks work for slightly smaller companies... ;-)
-- Carson _______________________________________________ firewall-wizards mailing list firewall-wizards () honor icsalabs com http://honor.icsalabs.com/mailman/listinfo/firewall-wizards
Current thread:
- Re: X server in a Firewall, (continued)
- Re: X server in a Firewall Cat Okita (Jan 24)
- Re: X server in a Firewall John M (Jan 24)
- Re: X server in a Firewall Marcus J. Ranum (Jan 24)
- Re: X server in a Firewall Peter Bruderer (Jan 25)
- Re: X server in a Firewall Marcus J. Ranum (Jan 24)
- Re: X server in a Firewall Cat Okita (Jan 24)
- Re: X server in a Firewall Paul D. Robertson (Jan 24)
- Re: X server in a Firewall Cat Okita (Jan 24)
- RE: X server in a Firewall Ben Nagy (Jan 24)
- RE: X server in a Firewall Cat Okita (Jan 25)
- Re: X server in a Firewall Carson Gaspar (Jan 25)
- Re: X server in a Firewall ArkanoiD (Jan 25)