Re: IPS vs. Firewalls (why vs. ?)

[Gabriele Buratti <gabriele.buratti () netasq com>]

Dave Piscitello wrote:
> If you take issue with this, consider
> that some companies who bash proxies as being performance inhibitors
> bolt SSL VPNs onto their firewalls.

Yep ! You still need proxies to do this SSL stuff as long as to hook an 
antivirus for example.
Remember the old networking rule "switch when you can, route when you 
must" ? In this field could be read as "analize on-the-fly when you can, 
rewrite with a proxy when you must".
This is something more than "cutting the corners" this is using the best 
tool available for each job.

> Marcus J. Ranum wrote:
> The fundamental issue always boils down to whether your product
> inherently implements default permit or default deny; what it
> does with the stuff that it will, inevitably, encounter that is
> outside of its knowledgebase.

You have to use both approaches here: let's say our knowledgebase is the 
definition of http protocol as it should be. So, if you find malformed 
http (=non compliant) you drop it. What if you find some instant 
messaging traffic (you don't want in your network) that is http compliant ?

        Gabriele

Attachment: gabriele.buratti.vcf
Description: