Firewall Wizards mailing list archives

Re: Lists of IP's we should be blocking


From: Kevin <kkadow () gmail com>
Date: Sat, 11 Dec 2004 19:46:16 -0600

On Wed, 8 Dec 2004 15:20:57 +0200, Bruce Smith
<bruce_the_loon () worldonline co za> wrote:
Is there a list of dangerous, evil IP's that should be blocked or at least
watched closely at the borders of the Internet?

No.

There are a number of special purpose DNSBL and IP blacklists, but the
primary reason there is no one universal block list is, who can we
trust to build and maintain such a list?

Obviously any "edge" gateway should be have rules to only permit out
packets showing a legitimate routable internal source (anti-spoofing
egress filters aka URPF), and there is no reason not to block outbound
traffic showing a destination address of your internal network,
RFC-1918 address space, or bogons (unallocated IP space, see here for
details: http://www.cymru.com/Bogons/)


Address like virus targets, root-kit sources and so forth.

This gets tricky, since these tend to move around, and can be innocent
bystanders or otherwise legitimate hosts.


And what is the group's opinion on the idea of a general purpose dark IP list?

There are legitimate lists of addresses which are not valid on the Internet:
    http://bgphints.ruud.org/articles/bogons.html
    http://www.nanog.org/mtg-0410/pdf/soricelli.pdf

These lists are effective because the contents change only very slowly
(but bear in mind the "69/8" address block problems), and reflect a
legitimate technical distinction between "valid" and "invalid"
addresses.  When you start getting into labeling individual hosts and
network as "good" and "evil", things can get very messy very quickly.

Kevin
_______________________________________________
firewall-wizards mailing list
firewall-wizards () honor icsalabs com
http://honor.icsalabs.com/mailman/listinfo/firewall-wizards


Current thread: