Firewall Wizards mailing list archives
sunscreen vs netbios
From: Todd Anderson <todd () bsd uchicago edu>
Date: Mon, 28 Oct 2002 13:40:23 -0600
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 I am having trouble getting sun to allow certian netbios traffic. my setup is a sunscreen lite 3.2 running static nat for a windows server. nat is working fine, no problems accessing stuff on the other side of the firewall. the netbios rule is a generous, but still not working add rule netbios * * ALLOW netbios works if I manually map a share net use x: \\server\share /USER:domain\me however, when I try to browse the network or join a domain I never see a response comming back to the external interface of the sunscreen. (using snoop) has anyone run into this, or is it a user problem? todd - -- Todd Anderson 773-834-2563 todd () bsd uchicago edu -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQE9vZKrvyLQBGnvNz4RAi7ZAJwJY23KpS7p9aggTEKTZFkuPlfyTQCgnnMF K340oBxEB6Sm82oRyfGc8Sg= =PNeu -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ firewall-wizards mailing list firewall-wizards () honor icsalabs com http://honor.icsalabs.com/mailman/listinfo/firewall-wizards
Current thread:
- sunscreen vs netbios Todd Anderson (Oct 28)
- Re: sunscreen vs netbios Mikael Olsson (Oct 28)
- Re: sunscreen vs netbios Jim MacLeod (Oct 28)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: sunscreen vs netbios Henry Sieff (Oct 29)
- RE: sunscreen vs netbios Elizabeth Zwicky (Oct 30)