Firewall Wizards mailing list archives
Re: Stats on how common NAT is?
From: "R. DuFresne" <dufresne () sysinfo com>
Date: Sat, 14 Dec 2002 23:43:01 -0500 (EST)
Duke Hospital just NAT'ed all it's internal address space, as they step up compliance with HIPAA. I've worked with a number of companies over the years that have used NAT as Bill Royd's mentions in his reply also. and as always, he gives sound advice and reasoning. Thanks, Ron DuFresne On Sun, 15 Dec 2002, Michael Still wrote:
Hello. I work as a software developer, and there has been some discussion at work as to how common NAT is in corporate environments (this affects whether we use DCOM or not). Does anyone have any pointers on how common NAT in corporate environments is? Why are these people using NAT, is it solely the expense of real IPs, or is it also for the added security? Thanks, Mikal
-- ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ admin & senior security consultant: sysinfo.com http://sysinfo.com "Cutting the space budget really restores my faith in humanity. It eliminates dreams, goals, and ideals and lets us get straight to the business of hate, debauchery, and self-annihilation." -- Johnny Hart testing, only testing, and damn good at it too! _______________________________________________ firewall-wizards mailing list firewall-wizards () honor icsalabs com http://honor.icsalabs.com/mailman/listinfo/firewall-wizards
Current thread:
- Stats on how common NAT is? Michael Still (Dec 14)
- RE: Stats on how common NAT is? Bill Royds (Dec 14)
- Re: Stats on how common NAT is? R. DuFresne (Dec 15)
- Re: Stats on how common NAT is? CTA (Dec 15)
- Re: Stats on how common NAT is? Paul D. Robertson (Dec 15)
- Re: Stats on how common NAT is? Mikael Olsson (Dec 15)
- Re: Stats on how common NAT is? Daniel Linder (Dec 16)
- Re: Stats on how common NAT is? Michael Still (Dec 17)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Stats on how common NAT is? CTA (Dec 15)