Firewall Wizards mailing list archives
Re: Stats on how common NAT is?
From: Michael Still <mikal () stillhq com>
Date: Wed, 18 Dec 2002 08:47:19 +1100
On Sun, 15 Dec 2002, Michael Still wrote: Hello
Does anyone have any pointers on how common NAT in corporate environments is? Why are these people using NAT, is it solely the expense of real IPs, or is it also for the added security?
I just wanted to write and say thanks for all the responses people sent back. Working as a software engineer in Australia, it s hard to predict what networks in other countries look like. I think I would have to say about half of the networks I have seen over here are NAT'ed, with that number increasing. Our marketting people assured us that no-one in the US NAT'ed. Clearly they are incorrect. Many thanks for the assistance, Mikal -- Michael Still (mikal () stillhq com) | Stage 1: Steal underpants http://www.stillhq.com | Stage 2: ???? UTC + 11 | Stage 3: Profit _______________________________________________ firewall-wizards mailing list firewall-wizards () honor icsalabs com http://honor.icsalabs.com/mailman/listinfo/firewall-wizards
Current thread:
- Stats on how common NAT is? Michael Still (Dec 14)
- RE: Stats on how common NAT is? Bill Royds (Dec 14)
- Re: Stats on how common NAT is? R. DuFresne (Dec 15)
- Re: Stats on how common NAT is? CTA (Dec 15)
- Re: Stats on how common NAT is? Paul D. Robertson (Dec 15)
- Re: Stats on how common NAT is? Mikael Olsson (Dec 15)
- Re: Stats on how common NAT is? Daniel Linder (Dec 16)
- Re: Stats on how common NAT is? Michael Still (Dec 17)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Stats on how common NAT is? CTA (Dec 15)