Firewall Wizards mailing list archives
Re: RE:Vulnerability Scanners ( was: concerning ~el8 / project mayhem )
From: "R. DuFresne" <dufresne () sysinfo com>
Date: Mon, 26 Aug 2002 12:02:29 -0400 (EDT)
I think Paul might be refering to the old court cases iinvolving the likes of Prodgy and such, whence they were seen to be 'content' providers, and sued cause folks' kids could bypass their filtering and access materials they deemd innapropriate <e.g. pron>. Those ISP's suffered greatly in the courts and paid a hefty sum, and not just to their lawyers. Thanks, Ron DuFresne On Mon, 26 Aug 2002, B. Scott Harroff wrote:
Actually, I think it's not necessarily good to stop "folks like Jim-" the "bad apple" defense means you *must* stop Jim once he's reported. However, if you put in a mechanism and it has flaws, you could be more liable for the things that get through than you are if you don't try. Suddenly you've placed yourself in the position of an editor, and legally, not trying and not failing is different than trying and failing.Your opinion is its better to do nothing and let 100% get though then though a combination of technology / process / policy that stops 95%? I think one would be better of showing "intent to protect and missing one instance or two" than "doing nothing about a known problem". _______________________________________________ firewall-wizards mailing list firewall-wizards () honor icsalabs com http://honor.icsalabs.com/mailman/listinfo/firewall-wizards
-- ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ admin & senior security consultant: sysinfo.com http://sysinfo.com "Cutting the space budget really restores my faith in humanity. It eliminates dreams, goals, and ideals and lets us get straight to the business of hate, debauchery, and self-annihilation." -- Johnny Hart testing, only testing, and damn good at it too! _______________________________________________ firewall-wizards mailing list firewall-wizards () honor icsalabs com http://honor.icsalabs.com/mailman/listinfo/firewall-wizards
Current thread:
- RE:Vulnerability Scanners ( was: concerning ~el8 / project mayhem ) Crispin Harris (Aug 21)
- RE:Vulnerability Scanners ( was: concerning ~el8 / project mayhem ) R. DuFresne (Aug 22)
- Re: RE:Vulnerability Scanners ( was: concerning ~el8 / project mayhem ) B. Scott Harroff (Aug 22)
- Re: RE:Vulnerability Scanners ( was: concerning ~el8 / project mayhem ) Adam Shostack (Aug 23)
- Re: RE:Vulnerability Scanners ( was: concerning ~el8 / project mayhem ) B. Scott Harroff (Aug 23)
- Re: RE:Vulnerability Scanners ( was: concerning ~el8 / project mayhem ) Dave Piscitello (Aug 25)
- Re: RE:Vulnerability Scanners ( was: concerning ~el8 / project mayhem ) B. Scott Harroff (Aug 26)
- Re: RE:Vulnerability Scanners ( was: concerning ~el8 / project mayhem ) Paul D. Robertson (Aug 26)
- Re: RE:Vulnerability Scanners ( was: concerning ~el8 / project mayhem ) B. Scott Harroff (Aug 26)
- Re: RE:Vulnerability Scanners ( was: concerning ~el8 / project mayhem ) Paul Robertson (Aug 26)
- Re: RE:Vulnerability Scanners ( was: concerning ~el8 / project mayhem ) R. DuFresne (Aug 26)
- Re: RE:Vulnerability Scanners ( was: concerning ~el8 / project mayhem ) B. Scott Harroff (Aug 22)
- Message not available
- Re: RE:Vulnerability Scanners ( was: concerning ~el8 / project mayhem ) Dave Piscitello (Aug 26)
- RE:Vulnerability Scanners ( was: concerning ~el8 / project mayhem ) R. DuFresne (Aug 22)
- Re: RE:Vulnerability Scanners ( was: concerning ~el8 / project mayhem ) Paul D. Robertson (Aug 26)
- Re: RE:Vulnerability Scanners ( was: concerning ~el8 / project mayhem ) R. DuFresne (Aug 25)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: Vulnerability Scanners ( was: concerning ~el8 / project mayhem ) Kalat, Andrew (ISS Atlanta) (Aug 22)
- Re: Vulnerability Scanners ( was: concerning ~el8 / project mayhem ) B. Scott Harroff (Aug 22)
- RE: Vulnerability Scanners ( was: concerning ~el8 / project mayhem ) Kalat, Andrew (ISS Atlanta) (Aug 22)