Firewall Wizards mailing list archives
Re: ssh holes? Trojans? [long]
From: jseymour () LinxNet com (Jim Seymour)
Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2000 18:41:23 -0400 (EDT)
=?iso-8859-2?Q?Magos=E1nyi_=C1rp=E1d?= <mag () bunuel tii matav hu> wrote:
[An SSH proxy...]
It is better than disable ssh because it cannot be monitored (I have heard of such cases, do not laugh).
Ironically, the organization the person who started this thread works for is doing just that :-). For the very same reason. Interesting how quickly the "root" of a discussion gets lost, is it not? Regards, Jim -- Jim Seymour | PGP Public Key available at: jseymour () LinxNet com | http://www.cam.ac.uk.pgp.net/pgpnet/wwwkeys.html http://home.msen.com/~jimsun | http://www.trustcenter.de/cgi-bin/SearchCert.cgi _______________________________________________ Firewall-wizards mailing list Firewall-wizards () nfr net http://www.nfr.net/mailman/listinfo/firewall-wizards
Current thread:
- RE: ssh holes? Trojans? [long] Ben Nagy (Oct 01)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: ssh holes? Trojans? [long] Jim Seymour (Oct 01)