Firewall Wizards mailing list archives
RE: COmpare Firewalls
From: "Joe Ippolito" <joe () joesnet com>
Date: Wed, 8 Sep 1999 06:01:29 -0700
So what I here you saying is that MS Proxy uses an application-level packet filter that is less secure than a kernel-level packet filter? Can you site an example and say why? Wouldn't either one have to get in front of the OS to filter incoming packets? -----Original Message----- From: owner-firewall-wizards () lists nfr net [mailto:owner-firewall-wizards () lists nfr net]On Behalf Of Dameon D. Welch Sent: Tuesday, September 07, 1999 11:06 AM To: joe () joesnet com Cc: firewall-wizards () nfr net Subject: Re: COmpare Firewalls On Tue, Sep 07, 1999 at 09:06:20AM -0700, Joe Ippolito wrote:
So you know of something that will protect an OS and is not an
application?
Hmmmm?
Proper firewalls are a combination of user-level applications & kernel-level packet filtering (stateful or otherwise). Any of the commercial firewalls that run on NT should fit this bill. -- PhoneBoy
Current thread:
- COmpare Firewalls TUDOR PANAITESCU (Sep 01)
- RE: COmpare Firewalls Joe Ippolito (Sep 07)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: COmpare Firewalls dwelch (Sep 06)
- RE: COmpare Firewalls Joe Ippolito (Sep 07)
- Re: COmpare Firewalls Dameon D. Welch (Sep 07)
- RE: COmpare Firewalls Joe Ippolito (Sep 08)
- Re: COmpare Firewalls Dameon D. Welch (Sep 08)
- RE: COmpare Firewalls Joe Ippolito (Sep 09)
- Re: COmpare Firewalls Darren Reed (Sep 09)
- RE: COmpare Firewalls Joe Ippolito (Sep 09)
- RE: COmpare Firewalls Joe Ippolito (Sep 07)
- Re: COmpare Firewalls Crispin Cowan (Sep 10)