Firewall Wizards mailing list archives
RE: Hardware vs. Software firewall reliability
From: dwelch () phoneboy com
Date: 15 Sep 1999 00:27:17 -0700
On Sun, 12 September 1999, "Joe Ippolito" wrote:
Isn't the state table maintained at least partially in memory though? Otherwise it seems that any type of clustering software would work for HA. All you would need is two minimal boxes and a shared RAID array.
Check Point's connection state information is stored entirely in RAM. Warm standby configurations (which can be achieved with clustering software) typically do not take advantage of Check Point's state sync feature. -- Dameon D. Welch, a.k.a. PhoneBoy (dwelch () phoneboy com) Check Point FireWall-1 FAQs at http://www.phoneboy.com/fw1/ The views expressed herein are not necessarily those of anyone else. -- Signup for your free USWEST.mail Email account http://www.uswestmail.net
Current thread:
- Re: Hardware vs. Software firewall reliability, (continued)
- Re: Hardware vs. Software firewall reliability Vin McLellan (Sep 09)
- RE: Hardware vs. Software firewall reliability Bill Stout (Sep 09)
- RE: Hardware vs. Software firewall reliability Ryan Russell (Sep 12)
- Tripwire like perl program Siglite (Sep 14)
- RE: Hardware vs. Software firewall reliability dwelch (Sep 14)
- RE: Hardware vs. Software firewall reliability Joe Ippolito (Sep 14)
- RE: Hardware vs. Software firewall reliability Bill Stout (Sep 14)
- RE: Hardware vs. Software firewall reliability Tina Bird (Sep 18)
- RE: Hardware vs. Software firewall reliability Joe Ippolito (Sep 18)
- Re: Hardware vs. Software firewall reliability Chenggong Charles Fan (Sep 18)
- RE: Hardware vs. Software firewall reliability dwelch (Sep 18)
- RE: Hardware vs. Software firewall reliability Garrahan, Kelvin (Sep 18)