Firewall Wizards mailing list archives
Re: NAT on router vs. firewall
From: Bill_Royds () pch gc ca
Date: Fri, 17 Jul 1998 11:01:13 -0400
Bill, If I want to limit it to certain source-ip addresses then I translate these into a separate pool of internal addresses in a one-for-one manner. (Which is something I do for one system where only one known internet address is currently to be allowed through). Neil Pike MVP/MCSE Protech Computing Ltd This would work but it seems a bit cumbersome since you would both have to change router and firewall to change rules. The original question was reasons for selcting router over firewall for NAT. The consensus seems that NAT on routers is probably faster but NAT on firewall can be more flexible.
Current thread:
- NAT on router vs. firewall Gregory Blake (Jul 12)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: NAT on router vs. firewall Bill_Royds (Jul 14)
- Re: NAT on router vs. firewall Neil Pike (Jul 14)
- Re: NAT on router vs. firewall Neil Pike (Jul 15)
- Re: NAT on router vs. firewall Bill_Royds (Jul 15)
- Re: NAT on router vs. firewall Neil Pike (Jul 17)
- Re: NAT on router vs. firewall Bill_Royds (Jul 19)